Showing posts with label Sexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sexuality. Show all posts

Friday, January 9, 2009

Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina

FOXNews Claims Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina - Scanner
FOXNews Claims Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina
Posted by Emily Farris




Rosenbaum's study showed that making a virginity pledge doesn't play a role any sexual behavior because teenagers who take a pledge are just as likely to have premarital sex as those who do not promise abstinence. The study also revealed that those who took virginity pledges where less likely to use condoms that non-pledgers, she said.


The church has been selling underage sex for hundreds of years. Does everything think they just stopped out of the goodness of their hearts? Please. You don't fuck with a recipe for power that good.

Church says: "We can't have the cloister girls playing safe! Then where would the teen pregnancy rate, and thus our supply of emotionally crippled children on which we build our future profits, be? No, WWJD bracelts are fine, so long as they bend over for the highest bidder, that way we can can 10% and the votes from both. My tax exemption isn't going to pay for itself you know. And besides I really like breaking in a promise girl right after a sermon about the evils of lust."

You know, it's quickly becoming pointless in my opinion to even share this shit with you people. How much more obvious does it need to be that you are being royally played?

Fucking mammalian roaches, the lot of you.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

"Pervert!"

Men online, how many of you have asked a girl for pictures? A/S/L The same shit you'd know generally the very second you laid eyes on them irl I might add, and odds are you're asking this question in a public place.

How often have you been scolded for it when it became clear the woman was physically attractive?

Hell, how many places is the question explicitly banned? How many places is the question itself treated like you just came all over their shoes?

What are they offended now that the subject of their beauty is of interest?

You know I'm always being accused of hating women, and I really don't but sometimes its really tempting to just generalize and run with it.

For example I just got a new job and there's a relatively attractive young woman working there, who is married and such, and I have absolutely no interest in her sexually or otherwise, she's truly just a co worker to me, but I have a habit of smiling and waving when I see people I know, and I still feel new at work so I'm trying to be as nice as I can to people, so I smile and nod at her or whatever whenever I catch her eye, and she makes it a point to look away from me without responding.

I know why. She's afraid that I want to fuck her and she has no interest in me at all. Which is fine except that I have no way of dispelling this assumption. I am forever convicted of being a horny walking hard on just looking for a dickless crotch to sniff just because I have a penis. Or more importantly because she's totally a product of The Company.

I am somehow the bad guy here. It is assumed because I'm male I want to fuck her. Now, I don't in this instance, but really, what if I did? We as a country spend more money on cosmetics then health care, and these barbies damn sure enjoy the result of being lusted after. I'm tired of being the pervert just because I don't measure up, when if I was a ripe blood sausage yearning for a new leech suddenly all those smiles and nods would land me a blow job in the bathroom instead of this look like I got caught watching her take a dump in a public restroom and then stealing her panties.

See its fine for me as a man to cry at night, building lame ass mix tapes and writing awful poetry thinking I'm in love when all I really need is a good long screw. To The company It's fine if I spend every waking minute of my entire adult life busting my ass for funds and spending them on everything from ax body spray to bow flex to Ferrari and work/obey/conform/consume with sufficient vigor, trying to please these vapid little wenches, sure. So long as I keep my suffering to my goddamn self if I'm not Brad Pitt, or at least as close as cute broad #562348562349 is gonna get thus far.

Its the same with every pretty girl. I swear that 12 year old had it right, being pretty equals being skinny and mean.

You express an interest and if you're not the sort of mindless money making machine control freak abusive asshole that women seem to adore these days, or they already have said money slave and you aren't good enough at a millisecond's glance to trade up for, you're somehow being offensive and “perverted”. Its like a whole society of cheerleaders in hot pants that say “juicy” across the tush whining about sexual harassment and their mother's lamenting the teen pregnancy rate in between Miss Ana Preteen USA pageants.

What triggered this post is a girl I know online had a picture and it was very small and it was cute, like a thumbnail of a famous girl. I figured it was just that. Lotza people choose to not use their real pics online, and thats fine, but I was curious, if she's hot it has an impact on the relationship. I'm supposed to pretend its not a factor? I lie for no one. Nothing people hate more than honesty, let me tell you.

Anyway..

So I ask her, is that you? She says yes, I see her avatar change a bunch of times, but I also see tons of other people straight up lie about their faces, so I ask her if she's really cute, I meant it as a gesture of trust, I wanted to try and make it clear I'm a friend regardless. She could be a 200 year old turtle for all I care.

And what happens? I get a “yes I'm hot please stop asking” and public proof of said hotness. Or at least as close to proof you can get this side of a web cam.

Stop asking. WTF!?

Why do I suddenly feel like I should have soiled panties in my left hand and child porn in the right while hammer the back half of a vinyl encased sheep?

I just gotta say for the record that is bloody unfair ladies.

You bust ass to be hot, make it public, expect all men to bust ass to compete for you, call your hotness a part of your identity, use metaphors for sex to describe and define your gender and love as often as I use vowels, and yet if I respond accordingly, and I'm not captain pennyworth six pack the human fuck machine with a dick made of chocolate and a trust fund with a net worth written in scientific notation, *I'm* the one with a problem and unrealistic expectations?!?

Fuck that.

Just like my previous work about mixed signals, if you can't even handle a question, if you don't even wanna TALK about it, here's a tip. You don't have to show anyone your face. Throw on a fucking burka, since you're content to throw away the proceeds of the women's lib movement by latching onto the dork of some rich white whale like a lamprey to a trout's belly anyway.

No, I don't hate women, I'm just damn tired of spoiled brat princess whores too weak to be prostitutes or good old fashioned (bless each and every one of them) sluts, treating me like I'm a goddamn monster for being born with a y chromosome.

Friday, May 2, 2008

A Response From “That Guy.”

Response to "How not to be that guy."

http://www.kekkai.org/alanna/thatguy.html

-----

Translations from a masculist perspective. Or a response from “that guy.”

This entire essay is in very poor taste. Wo0men react to this as if its helpful, when if I wrote a similar guide on how not to trip the gold digging vapid tease/whore reaction I'd be blasted as a male chauvinist.

Entitlement:

Let me open by saying...

You are not entitled to influence my behaviors in anyway in which I am not entitled to influence yours. You don't get to invent rules for me OF ANY KING outside the normal social contract established between ALL HUMANS. Your vag does not make you special. Equality is the name of the game and you're attacking it, plain and simple.

The irony is thick here considering the implication that you feel you are entitled to the opposite of the behavior you describe.

“If you approach me with the presumption, stated or implied, that I owe you anything -- my time, my attention, my energy, my conversation, my acquiescence to your desires -- that's entitlement. “

Translation: I'm a girl and therefor only my opinion matters. No matter where I am, or how I got there, I am in charge. I may be standing in your home, drinking your booze, eating your pizza, sitting on your couch, watching your friends play your ps3, but I don't even owe you conversation because I have a vagina.

Wrong. Yes you DO owe me recognition under certain circumstances. This even ground bullshit has got to go when the whole world gives you power just because you're in position of a vag. Put simply, with power comes responsibility, and what you owe depends on what you take, a vagina only means a unilateral absolute free ride if you're a spoiled sexist princess, which clearly you are.

This whole section is like hanging a sign up out front that says “lemonade inside” and then bitching (pun intended) when people knock on your door because you wanted a specific person to come looking for that lemonade, in this case Brad Pitt. Cast a wide net and you're gunna get a lot of boots. Don't blame the sea, or the boots. You're the one throwing the net. Until out country spends less on makeup than it does on health care, you're going to have to choose between keeping quiet or looking like a moron to anyone with an eye for simple logic. But then again those “tits” are showcased specifically to short cut logic aren't they, because if the men were thinking logically they'd pay a hooker rather than put up with your parasitic shit.

And I love the bit about rescuing the girl, this keeps the queue moving. “Hey men, I don't want to have to work up the balls to tell this annoying asshole to go away, will you do it for me like everything else in my life?”

Fight your own battles broad, odds are merely to be in your presence I had to put up with crazy bullshit ranging from evil bosses and bullshit schools, to fights and total submersion of who I really am. I'm tired of wearing your uniform and living up to your idea of what a man is. I'm tired of every song telling me I'm worthless without one of you lampreys sucking at my fiscal belly. I'm tired of the constant sexual lies, and the endless sexual innuendo wrapped in romantic platitude.

Hell even a drawn heart is shaped like a girl bending over or cleavage. Quit making EVERYTHING YOU ARE about sex and then calling men pigs for thinking about it.

I ask you, what percentage of movie, song, and literature would be annihilated if I asked a genie to remove all trace of romantic subtext from all recorded media. Most movies would be half an hour long, full 9/10ths of all music would vanish, if not more. Trillions of photographs, totally not including porn. Paintings, poems. Everything tells men to see women as godlike, which I have 0 problem with begin somewhat submissive sexually, and into D/s. What I do have a problem with is entitlement.

“Mostly because introducing sexual orientation into this would complicate it umpteen billion times over. “

Right because when your being a total female chauvinist equality really makes circular arguments transparent. We'd hate to remind the reader that this whole document is based on a sexist assumption. One which encourages lying. One would think you'd not want to teach men how to avoid begin “that guy,” since now “that guy” can lie about it and get closer to you.

But thats the whole point isn't it. Men are supposed to utterly suppress what they are these days to live up to absurd and unrealistic expectations. Liars get laid, and men are not to blame, when women punish the honest. Now granted women are held to some pretty high unrealistic expectations as well, but they share more of the fault for this since it is women who control the paradigm so long and men pursue and women choose, generally.

“I'm using the phrase "That Guy" here, because the people who display these behaviours are predominantly male; these behaviours come from a place of privilege, and right now, in our society, the men have the privilege. “

Without getting to much into it. I'll simply say prove it. Show me a single area of male superiority and I'll show you you're wrong. This challenge stands to all humanity, in the context of the American society (as of 2008). I can logically demonstrate any conclusion presented here, and I will defend it. My contact information IS here. I am not afraid to attach my name to this work for all of the world to see. Because I'm in the right.

http://innomen.blogspot.com/2008/02/masculism-now.html

“Then say to the guy, once she's gone: "Hey, I think you were making her feel really awkward. Back off a little next time, hey?" “

Right because god forbid she'd have to own up honestly to her discomfort. You should do all the work for her, after all its the man's job to pursue and risk being totally humiliated and shot down, its the girls job to be pampered for having a vagina. Right? Wrong.

“If you make me think that you think you can express a wish and I will fulfill that wish, that's entitlement. “ (and related statements)

You're blaming me for what you think!? I can “make” you think a certain way? Wow, how is that any different than blaming a girl for “making” me horny from across the room (even when not dressing like a French maid), and then calling her a tease?

Someone clearly has no understanding of human emotions. And why should you, its not like they matter when you're a totally pampered sociopath. In the real world, emotions are uncontrollable, the only things that are controllable are our reactions to them.

Every emotion is equally valid, only our actions and statements are up for scrutiny.

“It is so hard to explain how this is made manifest. “

Thats because its completely subjective and at your whim. Plus you probably don't want to admit your real motives. Fact is, all of these negative traits would suddenly be positive if coming from an obviously desirable mate. Arrogance would become confidence, vanity would become style, sexism would become chivalry, and so on.

“And trust me, I can tell the difference between you looking at my tits (because yeah, they're kind of hard to miss) and you looking at my tits and building elaborate fantasies about what they would feel like pressed up against you. “

Aside from the fact that this behavior would be alluring if it came from a man you wanted. Limited Brands Inc stock price tripled from '98 to the present. They own Victoria Secret. If you've ever worked in a mall or near one of these stores they are not packed with men. VS is kept afloat by women looking to draw attention, and judging by their fiscal profile and target demographic, thats a huge chunk of American women.

“I can absolutely tell the minute you get the bright idea, spoken or unspoken, that you're continuing our interaction for the sole or even the primary purpose of building the chance to feel those tits down the road. “

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.” - Carl Sagan. Is it fun being a psychic? And if you did possess this ability are you telling me that you'd not cultivate it if the target was a rich attractive prince? We both know better.

“There are a lot of men out there who are looking for someone to service their emotional needs... “

Again, if this came from Brad Pitt you'd say it was a tenderness and sensitivity, an honesty or openness. Your advice here is a trap, designed to keep nice guys way the hell away to make room for abusive pricks, which girls reward with children at a staggering rate in this country. Just look at our accidental and teen pregnancy, divorce, and domestic abuse rates. You as a gender regularly generally pick lying assholes.

How many chess club kids are in jail for domestic assault? What percentage of chess club kids got laid last night? And now drunken loud mouth abusive frat boys with beamers?

“These are the men who are poisoning the well and making it harder for us to believe you when you say that you want to help “

Did you miss the part where this whole post is basically a course on how to lie? Men who behave the ways you complain about are not going to read this and see the light they are going to read it and play the game. Don't complain about liars when you punish the honest.

“If you catch yourself thinking that of course you're not like those men, stop and take a good hard look at yourself...”

This is as ethically disgusting as how the television makes young women feel about how they look. “If you catch yourself thinking you're beautiful enough, stop and take a good hard look at your body...”

“You clearly did offend someone, or else the dogpile wouldn't have happened. “

Good to know that being right has NOTHING to do with it in your world. People can be offended and in the wrong at the same time. Go explain to a KKK man about how racism tends to stem from insecurity. You'll offend some people, but you'll also be right.

You need to explore moral absolutism and its logical pitfalls.

“It is a very sad fact that nine times out of ten, people with privilege, who are exercising that privilege in a way that makes other people feel uncomfortable, will not hear the fact that they are making other people uncomfortable until it's pointed out to them by someone with the same privilege. They literally will not process what people are saying. It happens all the time, and it is so subtle and pervasive that people don't see it even when someone calls them on it. “

L M A O, and the irony meter explodes leaving a crater the size of Cape Cod. Nosce te ipsum lady.

“And no. You don't get laid cookies for being an ally. “

Exactly. Assholes get cookies. Ladder theory anyone?

“He's going to beg, and plead, and guilt-trip, and pressure, and try by any emotional blackmail possible to turn that "no" into a "yes". “

Because it works. Virtually every romantic movie is some man's struggle to meet some women's requirements. To overcome her hesitation. Survey women in relationship over a year old and ask them why they are still in them. Guilt, fear and other negative emotions are going to be common answers. Maybe not the majority but significant, this suggests (but admittedly does not prove) that emotional blackmail is effective. The responsibility for that effectiveness rests with women, especially in an age where an EPO is a phone call away, and every city in the union has a battered women's shelter. And I won't even get into gun ownership. In my state you only have to FEEL threated to respond with deadly force legally. Don't blame men for exploiting your bad judgment.

“This can be really blatant -- trying to use physical intimidation to gain reluctant consent, for instance, like constantly trying to touch her or loom over her or get in her space -- or more subtle. The more subtle form can be anything from constantly dropping conversational references to the question or proposition, to the very very subtle "puppy dog eyes". “

Again, all of which would be rewarded if coming from the right “kind” of guy. (I'll refrain from further speculation on just what that kind of guy is.)

“Because the society we live in, the society women move through, is one of pressure. Constant pressure. (etc)“

Pressure imposed by their own decisions. Monogamy forces competition and women dictate monogamy. Men only wish for security. And since the majority of pregnancies are accidental children don't come into this. I've written almost a whole book on monogamy and its horrific impact on human culture. Women perpetuate monogamy to raise the value of erotic capitol. Sociology 101.

You want men to stay sexually tense so you can keep one of them all to yourself as a fucking pet, and trade sex which you have an infinite supply of for fiscal and social gain.

“We live in a world of the the male gaze, and it's reflected in the notion that women's bodies are communal resources. “

Thats simple biology. Testosterone is the sex hormone for both genders, men have more, men want to have sex more, that means in a culture where rape is prohibited and lethal competition between mates is prohibited men are going to be pursuers and women are going to be choosers. Since women dictate sexual terms, and enforce monogamy, it becomes in their interest to be as sexy as possible to attract the largest number of mates to filter for a good single one. Quit choose mates in such a way as to perpetuate this system. Learn to share like a grown up.

“...and I don't want to argue with another fucking horny jackass who's just doing this to try to get into my pants...” (...for free, when what I really need is a guy who measures up to my ludicrous standards to lie to me convincingly and make appropriate gestures both fiscal and emotive, to get into my pants.)

Lack of judgment on your part does not constitute failure on my part. You assume all men are would be rapists. Asking us to cater to your insecurity is unfair, when you're the ones who cultivate the mind destroying levels of sexual tension for profit in the first place.

“Persistence is not a virtue. Don't be That Guy. And if you see or overhear another man countering a "no" with "well, but --", you should repeat, very firmly and loudly, "Dude, she said no." Whether it has to do with sex or not. “

Right, so that she can reward the new guy with a sweet look and pass both of you up for the monstrous rich cute asshole at the other end of the room who will eventually make her feel like a totally worthless skin flap, after having fucked her all through the best years of her life.

“But to a woman's ears, that sounds a whole lot like "Let me come along and tell this woman (who cannot possibly be as smart as a man) about all the things that she thinks she knows. Because she can't possibly know them. “

So if I had a vagina that would some how change the logic of my position towards the correct side? Who gives a shit what it sounds like, here I was thinking what it IS would matter a touch more.

“Whether or not that's what you mean, that is what women hear. “

And thats MY fault!? Spoiled much?

“If you are ever, ever in a conversation about anything relating to gender expression, sexism, male/female relations, etc, and you catch yourself thinking, "She doesn't understand, and I need to explain this to her," stop. Walk away from the discussion (if it's online) or shut your mouth (if it's in person), and ask yourself: is it really that "she doesn't understand"? Or is it that she's coming from a place so different than yours that you feel like she doesn't understand your position? Do you think she doesn't understand your position because she doesn't agree with your position? “

Why is this my responsibility again? Why is it not equally applicable to the woman? Are you not doing the exact same sort of “explaining”? Let me guess, because you're a woman, right?

“In the case of clear-cut facts, there is an objective truth: you can reasonably expect to find the "right" answer. “

Not really, all truth descends from axioms which are unprovable.
http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node34.html

“No, really. Women know how their world works. For us, it works kinda shitty at times, thanks. “

If we're going to be generalists then the latest research would suggest a healthy “Not really.”

The world is too big to know concretely personally, which is what the female brain excels at. Thus to know it one must know it as an abstraction, and this is what the male brain is built for apparently. I certainly have a gift for large scale systems abstraction. And to say that the reason most great global leaders were male is the subject of sexism its simplistic and defeatist. A big part is women simply don't want that kind of power because they don;t need it to reproduce successfully like men do, thanks Genghis Khan for proving that beyond a shadow of a doubt, and a smaller but equally significant part is they probably just suck at it.

“This male advantage in seeing patterns and abstract relationships - what could be called general strategic rather than detailed tactical thinking - perhaps explains the male dominance of chess, even in a country like the U.S.S.R, where the game is a national sport played by both sexes. An alternative explanation, more acceptable to those who would deny the biological basis of sex differences, is that women have become so conditioned to the fact of male chess playing superiority that they subconsciously assign themselves lower expectations; but this is a rather wilful rejection of scientific evidence for the sake of maintaining a prejudice. “ - Anne Moir, Ph.D

“It's true for her, and she doesn't need you telling her how things 'really' are. “

So if a girl tells me that the planet has 2 billion people on it, its true for her? No.

“The fail happens when you take what people are saying to you and start coming up with arguments to counter and invalidate those experiences. “

So I'm not allowed to think critically at all now? I can see where you'd demand that given the quality of your work thus far.

“But if you've said or done something to call down the dogpile, please stomp on the initial impulse to come out swinging, no matter how in-the-right you think you are -- because a basic fact of possessing privilege is that you have to be really careful to avoid anything that looks like you're trying to silence the people without that privilege. And just about any defense at this point is going to come across like you're trying to use your privilege to silence people. “

Clever false choice. Third option; “that guy” actually IS provably, logically, and demonstrably, right, and is being wrongfully, spitefully, and childishly, attacked. At which point “swinging” is ethically demanded.

The dog pile is the mob. Being in the majority does not make you right, being right makes you right.

“There are things you don't know. There are things you can never know. You can be told about them, and you can, as you start to open your eyes and observe and listen, start to see and hear them, but you can never experience them firsthand. “

The smoldering remains of the irony meter actually twitch at the bottom of it's glassed crater.

“You can start to understand, but it will never be your world the way it is for a woman. “

Right because being born with a vagina gives one an intimate first had understanding of what its like to be stoned to death for being raped, just like being part German gives me the visceral understanding of what its like to be broken on the wheel.

Face it, if you're white, speak English, and have bread money, you probably don't know what real horror is. The difference between us is that I own up to this ignorance.

“And then stop and listen to what is being said to you, and imagine, as hard as you can, that the world being described to you is your world, and work from there. “

Again, why is this my problem? How does this not apply to women?

“Work from the perspective of: this is not my experience, but it clearly is her experience, and her experience is just as valid for her as mine is for me. “

And yet all the responsibility is apparently mine, and all the power is apparently yours. Fuck that. If you want true equality you'll submit your position to the rule of evidence, the only thing that isn't bias. Oh but them I'm not respecting your emotional boundaries. Sorry, the physical constants don't give a shit about how you wish gravity would work. Otherwise its all favorite color bullshit.

“She didn't misunderstand. She's not imagining things. It is possible. You just don't see it, because you have the privilege of ignoring it if you want to. “

Again clever use of the false dilemma fallacy. Third option; She actually is wrong, and he can prove it.

“And women don't owe you an education.“ Actually all who understand owe education to all who are willing to learn, thats the legacy of communication tribalism, and intelligence. It's part of the social contract and basic human ethics.

“Because that's when you start realizing that things should change. “

You REALLY want change? Share your boyfriend. Yea, thought not. Scrap relationships entirely. Quit asking for “commitment”. Live and let live as a human being surrounded by other human beings of differing type intention intelligence and compassion. Select each action base don each situation with an eye towards making yourself and those around your happier and healthier. THAT would change things. Work for a living instead of husband hunting. Dress comfortably instead of sexily. Throw away your make up. Ask yourself how much of what it is to be a woman you got out of a magazine or off the television. Define for yourself what your life should be about. IGNORE gender. Live as a human instead of a woman.

Stop using words like slut and whore to describe people who share sex. Stop confusing sex with love.

Yea, thought not.

“The absolute last words you should ever say in a discussion of sexual assault are "men can be raped too". “

Fact: The majority of rape victims are men. And before you toss out that prisoners deserve it, consider the majority of prisoners are there for drug charges. You think selling an ounce of crack should be punishable by rape?

“Or, well, pretty much anything that attempts to shift the focus of the conversation, subtly or not-so-subtly, away from women's problems and onto men's problems. “

Right, because men's problems don't count (much like those prisoners). Suck ti up, be a man. Right? Lady, we're both human, and have rights. You don't get to tell me what mine aren't. Thats how the social contract works. I don't kill you, you don't kill me, and on down the line. You wanna scrap that? Be my guest, just own up to it. I respect a hard core anarchist.

“because men are the group with the privilege “

Again, prove it. I can prove the opposite (in western or American culture) under any objective measure. Try me.

“it does not matter what your intention is. “

Yes, actually it does, to ethical thinking humans, anyway.

“Does this make you angry? Does it make you feel upset? Do you feel like your right to speak, like your right to be heard, has been silenced?
That's the space many women live in all the time.”

I can say the same. The difference between us is I don't see my oppression as granting me any special rights that women are not granted. I actually want equality. You merely want revenge.

“After-the-fact: “

Not good enough, I don't have to have been raped to know rape is HORROR. And there are many kinds of rape. If I had to pick between the rufie date rape and the prison rape, I'd pick the mickey any day of the week.

This post dedicated to Beth, whom I still know nothing about.

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Prostitution, and Taco Bell

A friend of mine inspired an explanation that I'd like to make public.

"I'm not ready to throw away romantic notions of a perfect companion."

Me either, I just know it can't be human. Humans can not act selflessly. It's like asking a wasp to be non-violent. It's a genetic impossibility. Selfish gene, breeds a selfish organism.

I want a mate that wants me happy first and foremost. We all do, as is evidenced by all the absurd claims of selfless love made in romantic comedies, shows, dramas, and songs, but if that were really the case, why would monogamy exist?

Because its a lie meant to assuage insecurity. They want you to think they're selfless for you, but if they really were they'd share you at times. From the male perspective an example is easy to find.

Picture this.

Couple in bed, guy wants sex, girl does not. Now normally the guy just has to jerk off or go without. I envision a world where the guy says, “Well, I'm going down to the love hotel, cool? (I love the Japanese) and the girl is like, “Right on just be quiet when you come back I gotta get up early.”

In the future his option instead of the hotel will be his sex bot.

Now before you think that's outlandish, here's a similar situation with a different animal need.

Same couple in bed, guy wants food, girl doesn't feel like cooking. Now the guy has to get food himself or go without. We live in a world where the guy's like, “Well, I'm going down to the Taco Bell, cool? (I love beef and potato burritos, no red sauce, grilled) and the girl is like, “Right on just be quiet when you come back I gotta get up early.”

Now don't tell me monogamy is about avoiding contagion, because eating out is just the same. Regulate it if you must, make it safe, sure, but saying prostitution should be illegal because it spreads disease is the same as saying eating out should be illegal because of e-coli and salmonella.

Now I am sure there are female equivalents. I won't speak to them because I'm not female.

But honestly, making it so you can only have sex with one person or you don't 'love' them is as stupid as saying you can only eat one person's cooking, and making a sandwich for yourself means you're a loser. Sex is hunger without the need for other life forms. Defending monogamy by saying you won't die from lack of sex, is like saying “Well a person can live on rice water and vitamins, so lets make all other kinds of food illegal.”

It's not about living, its about the enjoyment of life. It's about the freedom to choose what love is, and how to seek it. It's about Freedom. And no argument to my mind attacking freedom can stand in this context.

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Nude Photography is not Art

Sorry for some nude stumbles i have been stumbling this week, actually i like it as an ART.

I recently fished this gem off a Stumbleupon page of a person with like 600 fans claiming to be a single woman from England. Naturally, her avatar photo looks like a 15 year old leaving for the mall.

Now I don't know this woman, never even spoke to her, or even read her blog other than her profile page, she may actually be what she claims to be, and may not be selling an image to promote various online enterprises, she may also be the most compassionate intelligent woman on the face of the earth. Though I must admit a measure of doubt.

But she's just the straw that broke the camel's back on a subject I've been meaning to speak about. I love a little hottie as much as the rest of you, in fact when I build my robot lover, I'll use photos lifted from 'nude art' blogs as a base for her construction I'm sure.

But I really need to make a point clear here about erotic photography claimed as art. The women may be attractive but you need to understand why. They are not beautiful like a sunset is beautiful. Consider, if it were nude 400 pound flabby hairy men?That's just as much a miracle of biology. Hell even more so. A healthy young woman doesn't inspire any question other than "How best could I sell my soul as her slave to acquire a millisecond of sexual service?" Flabby behemoths are far more interesting, you find yourself thinking "How does it even walk?"

Sex is not art.


I love hearing people try to say artsy things about nude photos. "Look how the light catches her smooth rounded breasts." That would so not work if the subject was a new york truck driver."Look how the light catches his lumpy asymmetrical frontbutt."

Sex is sex and there's nothing wrong with it. After all, I'm the guy that wants to deregulate prostitution, eliminate age limits in favor of a true maturity/inteligence based citizenship test, populate the world with thinking feeling, loving, AI driven or grown sex dolls, and annihilate all sex/relationship/marriage/love law beyond overt harm such as rape, privacy invasion, assault, etc. Flaunt it if ya got it I say, but don't try to make us fight over it. Because people get hurt that way. If you're gunna show off your cookies, be ready to share, or at least sell for a fair price.

Point is, I'm no prude. But confusing sex with art is dishonest. We live in a world that is grossly sexually oppressed. Sex has come to equal art because religion has made sex dirty, corporations have made sex costly, and government has made sex a crime, so we say that our porn is art to keep our girlfriends, wallets, and freedom.


It's REALLY pissing me off.


We say beautiful when we mean fuckable. We say fresh when we mean fuckable. We say adorable when we mean fuckable. And we say Art when we mean porn. Along with all the other advertising and lyrical euphemisms for sex and sexual service. There's virtually no compliment you can pay a girl these days that can't be easily translated or doubled into some sex reference. And calling porn art does not bloody well help. Now don't get me wrong, there are forms of erotic art, The Story of O, I bow before that books greatness for example, but paying a hottie to squirm on the hood of a 300k$ car is not it.

99.99999999999999999% of erotic photographers are closet Johns. (and Janes?)

Bullshit Photographer: “I'm not paying for a sexual favor, I'm making ART, yea thats it, ART. Now here Britney, grip this riding crop in your teeth, squish your tits together, arch your back, and crawl for me.”

Every popular musician has turned into a strip tease artist, singing what amount to one way phone sex into cd's and selling it. I didn't choose the name Britney by chance. Everyone loves a school girl in a short skirt asking “Hit me baby one more time.” Come on, a whole generation of people wanted to pretend they had a spanking fetish like me for 30 seconds when they first saw that video. Girls to, because they saw the effect it was havering on the guys. “You mean I can sport a plaid mini skirt, white panties, with little girl pigtails, and get whatever I want from half the population? Where do I sign up?”

Ticketmaster and Tower Records apparently. And now fucking Stumbleupon as well.

If I had the money I would hire a professional photographer to do nudes of myself styled after each and every one of these so called art pages, white are always full of black and white child like nude models or shaven muscle bound metrosexuals, and see how many people still call it art when it's my flat hairy behind pressed up against the windshield.

Art is something you create, something from your mind and hands. Good photography is an art because of what it takes to get that shot and set construction timing etc. Nude photography is not art. Any funded jack ass can pay a hottie to strip somewhere and squirm around on something while he takes 10,000 photos and pick out the one where she stopped looking like a pill head with ruined dreams of nursing long enough for the shutter to click.

I see living barbie girl #345,836,385 squirming in the sand in front of a beautiful sunset, and I think, I wish that greedy vapid bitch would go get a job that involves actual work and move so I can see that sunset better. And I wish that asshole with the money for a 12mp camera and a trip to Tahiti would take pictures of something without breasts that I can make my back ground without turning my computer into the equivalent of a sticky centerfold scotch taped to the wall in a 15 year old's closet.

Any of my regular readers notice my complete lack of compunction with regard to the personal and subjective tone of this piece? That right. Expect more of this because like is said before.

I'm fucking done.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

From pedophilia to free speech in 5 petitions flat.

Archive of conversation stemming from this Stumbleupon review.

-------------------

So I'm a fascist for wanting this site of the net?

No you’re a fascist for wanting ideas that are damaging to the state to be illegal to talk about.

I really don't think so. Pedophilia is illegal, and endorsement of it is too.

So is drug use, I don’t see your petition to delete high times. Besides since when does legality dictate ethics? Have you personally decided that pedophilia is wrong, or are you letting the government do it for you? Is pedophilia a choice? Is homosexuality? It was illegal for a long time as well you know. You’re simply not being rational. You’re waving a torch and looking for a witch.

If pedophilia is not a legitimate sexual difference, then its merely mental illness, and should be censored about as much as pages about Elvis being an alien. Your reaction justifies their position. You've given the page FAR more attention than it would have otherwise and aided them in the enlistment of support they otherwise never would have had, like from people like me. You made it a free speech issue when you dragged in censorship. You've helped them more than they ever could have. Your desire for control has caused you to lose it.

You've become this guy.



I really don't understand how can you equate pedophilia with spanking.(I'm agaunst that too as you already know.)

That’s because you’re ignorant. I’d normally be happy to enlighten you, but if you don’t already know, I have my doubts about if you’re even capable. And since you don’t understand the spirit of free speech or the political and social reality of limiting it, how can I possibly expect you to understand equal protection under the law which is a far more esoteric concept, and is at the very heart of the spanking debate.

I agree that there are other horrible things that can befall children and this is one of them.

Some guy writing a page talking about something is a horrible thing happening to them? That's unimaginably insulting to all the children who actually have had horrible things happen to them. You think I made up the Ritalin thing?

This is a simple issue of a content being illegal.

No, it’s an issue of what’s right. This is where your fascism comes into play. Illegal is simply something the state does not want you to do, and now you want it ok to be illegal to even TALK about illegal things, that's fascist. Protesting can be disturbing the peace, outing misconduct of your leaders can be a threat to national security, treating your cancer with marijuana can be possession of narcotics. Legality is irrelevant.

They're not just thinking about having sex with children and no one wants them for a hate crime, they are actively promoting pedophilia.

Innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply to sexual deviants eh? The only thing that page proves is that someone made a page that advocates an unpopular position. And as I said in my review, you don’t even know the intention of the author for sure, much less the crimes, if any, this mysterious ‘they’ you speak of, may or may not have committed.

As you know, open invitations to violence and illegal conduct are not protected by Freedom of speech.

Again, Fascism. Defense of the state is not why we have freedom of speech. We have freedom of speech because it’s a concession we implicitly force them to give us. IE, in exchange for their tolerance of whatever we have to say, we let them rule us.

Your position that simply because something is illegal it cannot be promoted is absurd. Look at the law, things that are currently illegal are promoted daily, it’s called lobbying and it’s a main point of the legislative process. But before that can begin you must talk about it. And the internet is the best tool for that ever built.

You’re straw manning their position. Sexual law and what defines an adult changes from state to state, and indeed from person to person if you ask me. Effectively what they’re advocating is civil rights issue. While I agree that their reasoning is detestable, again, I say, as American sentient humans they have the right to do so and if you don’t like it you can make a page of your own explaining it and no one (should) will censor you for it.

To ask the government to fight that battle for you is weak, disgusting, and dangerous.Are you so afraid of their view that you think it must be buried?

Face it, you’ve been taken in by hate mongering. And a fox news style vision of what free expression means.

---------

I don't recall giving you the liberty to publish parts of our private correspondence.

Heh, I don't recall asking, I'll publish what I please, if you don't like it petition me to be censored.



Nevertheless, you are mistaken. Calling me ignorant and fascist is not making your claims any more valid.

No it doesn't, hence the detailed logic I backed my claims up with that does. You apparently ignored those parts, I guess some people are equipped with internal censorship.



I am abhorred that you would equate homosexuality with pedophilia. Where one is a relation between two consenting adults, the other is ALWAYS abuse.

Why? Both are genetically driven sexual aberrations of dynamic social tolerance, no more a choice for the host than eye color. Pedophilia is no more a guarantee of child abuse than being heterosexual guarantee's you'll rape coeds. The only difference is pedophilia have an extremely limited outlet for their desire, since assholes like you make even drawings stories and fiction on the subject illegal dude to your delicate sensibility.

You're blinded by the ego boost of howling for blood with the crowd. You think yourself above animal hate, and that ignorance is dangerous. You're like the bigot trying to justify hatred with crime statistics.

Besides, it's circular. Of course its always abuse, you invalidate their consent by claiming that a child is not a person and can therefor not give consent. But the fact is, some children are smarter and wiser than some adults will ever be. Judging adulthood by chronological distance from birth is outmoded, lazy, and boils down to age discrimination. Don't pretend that consent is the issue. You simply want to make decisions for others. I sympathize believe me, but my freedom depends on their freedom and you're smart enough to recognize that. You're simply being an armchair hero, defending the poor innocent little princess doll baby in your mind from the big bad evil barbed cock monsters drolling and jerking off at her window in big black hats. It's intellectual masturbation pure and simple.



Some guy writing a page talking about something is a horrible thing happening to them? That's unimaginably insulting to all the children who actually have had horrible things happen to them.



I wasn't talking about that site per se; but about pedophilia in general.

But you're attacking the site using arguments that only apply to child rape. You've deliberately mixed your target to distract from the fact that your point is hopelessly flawed. You attack someone's free speech and then try to paint their speech as child rape when the point is speech is not rape, even if it's about, or in support of rape.



In short-- we have a site that promotes and glorifies not only illegal but morally unacceptable and violent, abusive behavior. The site needs to go down.

Others would disagree, and they have as much right as you do to speak, hence the 1st amendment. The Internet is not Disney. And you simply don't have the right to demand that the world think as you do. Your rights end where other's begin, fail to grasp that at your own peril.

Aren't we all that guy?

No. Some of us fight for others, even when they are wrong in our opinion.



------



I'll be reporting you to StumbleUpon for TOS violation.



I don't need to "petition" you for anything.



Since our debate is a waste of time I will be blocking you now.




Good luck, since I didn't use your name. And I didn't mean petition me genius, I meant petition the government via your ineffectual little petition site. And the debate itself was not a waste of time, attempting to convince you personally of anything, is the waste of time.



Thank you for playing and admitting defeat gracefully :)



Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Pot, Kettle, Black

Sicko "Marriage Contract" One For The Ages

Repulsive "Wifely Expectations" pact emerges in Iowa kidnap case

FEBRUARY 17--This country, as you know, is filled with the deranged. And then there's Travis Frey, a 33-year-old Iowa man who is facing charges that he tried to kidnap his own wife (not to mention a separate child pornography rap). Frey, prosecutors contend, apparently is a rather demanding guy. In fact, he actually drew up a bizarre four-page marriage document--a "Contract of Wifely Expectations"--that sought to establish guidelines for his spouse in terms of hygiene, clothing, and sexual activities. In return for fulfilling certain requirements, Frey (pictured right) offered "Good Behavior Days," or GBDs. Each GBD, Frey wrote, could be redeemed by his wife to "get out of doing the things" he requested daily. A copy of the proposed contract, which Frey's wife never signed and later provided to cops, can be found below. While we normally point out the highlights of most documents, there are so many in this demented, and very graphic, contract, we really can't do it justice. So set aside ten minutes--and prepare to be repulsed. (4 pages)

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0217062contract1.html



----------------------



While I obviously agree, as the bulk of you do, that these demands are unreasonable. I think pejoratives like sick and demented (based only on the contract) are unwarranted and stem directly from honesty about and disclosure of what should be a private matter.



Would you like every thing you've ever done or wanted sexually to be a matter of public record? Which I might add has become a euphemism for public ridicule.



Your ranting at this man is as mature as tossing apples at the village drunkard chained to the pillory. You're kicking a criminal because you can. Why don't you rant at what caused him to think this was reasonable behavior in the first place? Namely monogamy! And where is the vitriol for the women willing to marry a man like this?



Consider, you as a society tolerate just this sort of self centered madness daily. More than tolerate it, you subsidize it! Consider, he actually had a wife to present this contract to. So at least one woman subsidized this person with a relationship that culminated in marriage. Is she a 'sicko' too? If so where's the hate for her? For every 1 'sicko' like this there are at least 50 decent single men whom women in general would not touch with a ten foot poll.



Hell even the asshole that circumcised his son with a utility knife had multiple women, and 11 kids.



You're just mad about the contract because he is illustrating a fact that you guys love to hide. All relationships are exchanges. Granted, not this declared and not this unilateral. Consider the level of subservience demanded in many consensual D/s relationships, are they all sickos as well? Are we going to make this a sexual rights issue?



Honestly I don't see anything wrong with the attempt. Prenuptial agreements are pretty much this fucked up, just not as specific. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but legally speaking, a contract may contain any act that's legal. And I don't see any criminal behavior required of either party. Besides I don't see his duties listed, doesn't a contract also have to have duties for both parties in order to be a contract?



I think this contract is clearly a sex toy, not a realistic demand and it was given to the public out of anger (justified or not) and spite. If it were an actual demand would it be any different from the consequences of the traditional obey clause in the wedding vow? Could a husband in a traditional Christian setting not ask for all these things and expect them as a matter of spousal duty? So again, who are you really mad at?



You people are just angry because he's being unabashedly honest about the nature of what a marriage is, and most of you lie to your mates about what you want thinking that they don't know thinking that you'll make a profit form the deception while they simultaneously lie to you.



News flash, marriage and monogamy is mainly about sex people and it always has been. Its primarily a human ownership contract that confers sexual rights and limitations. The men hate this guy because they are making public what about 90% of them would take if they could get it. A sweet little sex slave. And the women are mad because they don't want to see open negotiation of spousal duties because of the huge advantage they currently posses due to ignorance on the part of men, that advantage being centered around sexual power.



And he's brutally honest about his own desires, something we as citizens are always humiliated for doing.



P.S. For the record, since people seem to fail to grasp this, I am not defending this individual person, merely the action of attempting to contractually bind a mate in sexual detail, because thats what the bulk of you do covertly. Had this been about money and instead of sex, it wouldn't even be on the net, which says something about your puritanical roots.



I don't know this person and neither do you. And I obviously do not condone kidnapping or child pornography. But I see nothing wrong with writing a contract and presenting it to someone so long as no force or other unethical acts are used to obtain a signature.





Sunday, February 17, 2008

Miccola's Question

I was asked by a bright young girl, why I feel the way I do about relationships prior to sexual legality. The answer ended up being long winded and somewhat unique. So I've made it a post to share with the world.



Thank you Miccola.



...why do you think this?“



The short answer would be observation and experience. But I know you want an answer with more substance.



The fact is I've written a book, a blog, and had many debates on the subject. So its hard to answer what I consider to be a huge and complex question with any degree of brevity. But I own you an attempt.



They can all be found from underlore.com



Our society tells women that the best thing about them is their 'beauty' or sex appeal. It tells them this with money, social order in the form of gender roles, and advertising primarily.



Young women, having no frame of reference, accept this because it's by and large the earliest thing they hear, even as infants for example, "Oooo she's so beautiful!". At this point it's innocent, but at some point it begins to take on a sexual connotation. Obviously this is going to begin on an individual level around puberty. So beautiful like a water fall starts to mean beautiful like a playboy model. All this at the same time as being told that a relationship is about 'love', which is not about, but paradoxically is related to, sex.



I say related to sex because if a 'relationship' were not about sex, if it were merely about companionship, similar interests, meaningful psychological connection, and all the other platonic traits ascribed, then why should the gender or the sexual orientation of the companion matter? Or said differently, how would it be different from a normal friendship? Obviously the difference is protestations of love and attraction. “You are so beautiful” “I love you so much” etc. but the obvious rule is you must say these things to someone you are willing to have sex with, now or in the future, or were willing to have sex with in the past, as expressed in elderly couples still having relationships well past sexual ability. That is the only real difference.



So, having established that every 'romantic' relationship, must be, by definition about sex, we can add in age and experience, and arrive at my initial claim; that a young attractive woman has almost no chance of developing what I would call a healthy understanding of what a relationship is.



A relationship is about sex, you have sexual value, it is illegal to openly pursue you for this reason, but people will desire to do so anyway since sexual development in America (thanks in part to our diet) occurs much earlier than the 18 year age limit. The consequences of this pursuit are monstrous if the 'goal' is reached, which as I've shown above, by definition, must be sexual in nature, or else its not a relationship, just a deep meaningful (and perfectly legal) friendship. And here's how I know your boyfriend is an idiot or a possessive liar. And where I get my feeling that relationships in general, especially for one who is young female and attractive, are a bad idea.



If he is willing to pursue you openly, and think that he's immune from prosecution because he's around your age, he's dangerously ignorant. If he's willing to risk being marked as a sex offender for life, and being raped in prison just for sex with a pretty girl, he's a moron. If he claims that sex is not a goal of his, then he is lying, and merely wishes to secure you for future sexual advances. This is unfair to you, because as a woman you are the chooser sex, and that choice, in order to be free, needs to be informed, and it can only be informed by exploring your options, and his action is designed expressly to limit those options to one, him. This is underhanded and not at all considerate of your life. It is also indicative of extreme insecurity. I've never understood why this behavior is lauded as a healthy gender norm for men.



Society is trying to turn you into a trophy. They encourage you to have relationships, when what a relationship really is in our society is a contract that no one should enter into.



When he expresses his care for you, ask him if he could feel this way about a person with whom he could never have sex, and have him explain why he must have you to himself, and listen for ownership ideas. Remember that true love is limitless, for example having another child doesn't mean you love your first one less. Granted there are different types of love, but thats a cop out because no matter what you call it, it has a definition, and if it's really a form of love, it has no limits. So if he speaks about love, and includes a limit, he's actually talking about lust.



The claims made here are in general, there will always be exceptions, but I'm talking about the majority, and the ideas, not the people.



I look forward to your reply.