Self Defense: playermatt

Sometimes I feel like I could agree with Innomen, and then he goes batshit crazy the next sentence. It's like, "That makes sense... yes, good point... Ha, I can't believe I'm agreeing with Innomen! Wait. Wait. What the fuck? What the FUCK?" And, sadly, that's only about halfway through the wall of text.

Let me write a (comparatively!) concise version of every essay every written by Innomen, so that you never have to suffer through dedicating two hours of your life to his writings:

I am Innomen, the most original thinker in today's world. My alter-ego is a talking vagina, but forget about that -- I have no issues with women, and I'm definitely not a misogynist. In fact, I envy women! I wish I were a woman. If I were a women, I could have so much power over men, because, as everyone knows, women choose the man; the man never chooses the woman. Never! And I could always be the center of attention, everywhere I go! If only I were a woman... it's so hard being a heterosexual, white male in this matriarchal society. If only I were a woman, I could choose when and with whom to have sex, and I'd never be turned down, because, as we all know, no man has ever turned down a woman for sex. Ever. And I could sleep around all I wanted, with no repercussions at all, because women who sleep around are never vilified in our matriarchal society. If only I were a girl... (sigh) Girls don't know what it's like to be a man, and how hard it constantly is. In fact, did I ever mention that I got beat up in high school? I must be the only person in all of the world who attracted bullies, and, even though it's been over ten years, I still carry those wounds. Let me tell you about each and every bully who ever hurt me, because, let's face it, I'm the important one here. You're here just to be educated or be deprogrammed of your slave-think. I'm here to help you evolve into OH GOD I JUST CAN'T GO ON. I'M STARTING TO GET INSIDE INNOMEN'S HEAD, AND IT'S SCARING ME. AND YET, I CAN'T STOP BECAUSE IT'S CLEARLY UNDER 5000 WORDS. THE AGONY, THE SELF-HATRED, THE FEAR... HELP ME.

This guy is without a doubt my favorite hater for one simple reason. He's me when I was 15. Almost exactly. Its like the time machine paradox for me. I was guilty of every flaw here exposed. And so, what will likely be my final self defense post from stumble upon, given that I'm done producing content for them, barring more blasts from the past, I'm pleased to present my counter argument to this hateful and incorrect review.

Edit: That day I received 3 new reviews of hate, so his was obviously not the last.

First of all, I've been writing my whole life. And a good huge chunk of that body of work is to be found online. He says he dedicated two hours of his life to my “writings” and then complains about the “wall of text”. I'm thinking he had already decided how he felt before he even began reading, if he began reading at all.

I don't blame him really, its a daunting and unpleasant read, because of the daunting and unpleasant subject. But since I'm writing about the foundation of human society, those two traits, if found in relation to this subject at all, should warrant further reading.

Of course, if you're going to make up my position for me, as this young man has down so bluntly, I suppose reading the work isn't needed.

I'm tired of using the word and indeed the concept of strawman, but the repetition is hardly under my control. So long as people chose to argue with their own word rather than mine, I'll continue to point out this fact.

However, if taken as a list of implied arguments, instead as a sarcastic rant, why actually find a critically valuable list of counterpoint to my positions.
So what I'm going to do here is extract those implication to the best of my ability and answer those instead.

Deep down I think if I had met myself when I was 15, I'd have hated the older version, but I would have been fascinated none the less. In order to placate that satisfaction and allow my younger self to save face, I'll respond.

I apologize if I miss the mark with my extracted implications, but thats the price you pay for communicating via sarcasm. Next time figure out what you really mean and say that instead.

So lets get started.

“ My alter-ego is a talking vagina, but forget about that”

The implication being that I'm so obsessed and gender confused that I subcionsioly make my face genitalia.

Well, I will admit that gender roles do occupy a significant portion of my thoughts, but only on a systemic level beyond my personal animal needs. I'm quite comfortable with my body, ,gender and sexuality. I could go on.

“I have no issues with women, and I'm definitely not a misogynist.”

since the entire post is sarcastic, treating phrases as opposites will be common. This is the first such case.

If you seriously believe I hate women then you could not have progressed very far into my “writings”

read the article with woman hating in the title on my blogspot for a complete refutation of the claim that I hate women.

You then go on to imply again that I'm gender confused and wish to be a woman. And that I feel our society is a matriarchy.

Well, again, no, I'm quite comfy having boy parts, and no I don't consider our society a matriarchy My position is that if it were an open matriarchy things would be quite a bit improved. You like many have this lovely mental infection which causes you to make logical leaps it completely wrong directions. In this case the leap from the claim that mating is the most important aspect of social development and that women are the most powerful figure in mate selection and thus mating, to saying that society is ruled by women.

Society is an abstraction given birth to by the mating process, which is controlled by women this does not mean however that society itself is run by women. Far from it, like an abused mother with a gargantuan and aggressive teen, society is run by abusive ignorant greedy men with the fore site of a mayfly, and the morals of a pit viper.

Sure the mother shares a degree of responsibility, if such a thing even exists in the face of various facts about reality, but thats not top say that all social ills can be laid at the feet of women, especially considering that the choices women make in a cold feed back cycle are often controlled by that very society.

“I could choose when and with whom to have sex, and I'd never be turned down, because, as we all know, no man has ever turned down a woman for sex.”

so you think I'm oblivious to the fact that in certain circumstances the male becomes the chooser on a superficial level. Of course males get to choose at times, but only between women who have chosen them. Or women who choose them after being made aware of the fact that they exist as a choice.

This is not the same as claiming that women have never been turned down for sex, far from it, but of course you know all that, you're trolling. You're implying something here that even you don't believe in an effort to annoy me.

Fail. You might have noticed I like written debate, this whole thing is fun for me, I'm on my lunch hour, you're part of my hobby. :)

“And I could sleep around all I wanted, with no repercussions at all, because women who sleep around are never vilified in our matriarchal society.”

no, my position is that women have the authority on a personal level to begin to corrode monogamy, if you had read my work you'd know that I consider myself a champion of equal rights, not just men's rights. The slut player double standard is one of the many things I'd like to see annihilated. I'm well aware of the consequences a woman faces if she frees herself sexually, and wishing to remove those consequences would seem to also serve as an argument against the claim that I'm a women hating gender confused bigot :)

“In fact, did I ever mention that I got beat up in high school? I must be the only person in all of the world who attracted bullies”

First of all there is the implication that I'm supposed to not discuss what happened to me. Second of all is the implication that I can only take issue with a social problem if its a part of my day to day life. Third is the implication that I'm obsessed with my past experience simply because I make mention of it in perfectly relevant contexts, fourth is the implication that for a problem to have merit it must be unique.

Well, one, I'm not ashamed of my life or any of my reactions, my parents taught me from a very early age to not make decisions I would later regret and to grasp the concept that while a decision may have appeared correct t the time it may still be wrong, and that the perfect decision is an illusion. So I'm pretty well without regret.

Two, I use my experiences at the mercy of alpha idiots merely to highlight the duration of the problem and the duration of my thinking about the problem. There is an assumption that in order to know anything you must be 50 and have a degree in it that constantly needs attack. Most of my mention of my past is with an eye towards that sort of explanatory purpose.

Third, I'm well over my experiences on a personal psychological level beyond their impact on the formation of who I am today. In truth I handled what they did pretty well, I never even had nightmares, but I did think a lot about why I was treated as I was, it was a puzzle, and I've always liked puzzles.

And finally, my past is relevant in that I know it continues to happen all over the west. Perhaps everywhere. Anywhere children group, the adults in authority will encourage the males to fight amongst themselves with varying degrees of openness, and encourage the females to choose the strongest among them to desire and, choose the equal among them to actually pair with.

Did it occur to you that I simply care about the experiences of children? If not is that deficiency of imagination honestly my fault?

As a side note, if you can name two of my bullies I'll give you 10$ via PayPal.

“I'm the important one here. You're here just to be educated or be deprogrammed of your slave-think.”

this one is particularly amusing, am I supposed to take a sycophantic tone towards a faceless anonymous reader simply because statistically speaking at least one of them is going to be my superior intellectually or in any other way?

It's my writing on my blog, all about my opinion, and you're attacking my self important perspective? Thats like accusing a marathon running of being in too much of a hurry and overly competitive Have some awareness of the setting man. Do you think I just walk around and lecture people? Opening conversations with “did you know you're a moron?” everything has a time and a place, and this is exactly the time and place for my writing.

I will not speak in eprime simply because you've given up on context and perspective. Besides, the instant I did you'd simply accuse me of being simple minded.

I assume that readers are interested in my opinion when they read my blog. Color me crazy :P

“ I'm here to help you evolve into OH GOD I JUST CAN'T GO ON. I'M STARTING TO GET INSIDE INNOMEN'S HEAD, AND IT'S SCARING ME”

Thats quite interesting because where you stopped is pretty much where the singularity occurs heheh.

I'd stop too, lol.

You actually are in my head to a degree, you just have some slight imperfections in vision. I think you find me threatening because of our similarity. In some ways my mere existence threatens your identity. And I feel your pain. Often time I'll hate in others what I see in myself. But I'm doing better.

Thanks for the banter man, that was a great lunch hour :)

Self Defense: imorgen

Ah, here we go again (he can't mind me linking like that surely, since he spams his own blogs at every opportunity).

It's telling that there are apparently two camps, "those who have asked "Are you really leaving?" and followed it up with kind words", and then "everyone else" aka "you people" (horrible and/or ignorant). The "private" bit does also seem a tad ironic in light of his contacting people, often with huge assumptions, then posting their private responses all in relation to himself.

Oh neat, new word.

I get the point, and I'm sure to some I meet the definition, but allow me to pose a hypothetical relating to the ethic of keeping your mouth shut while exiting.

Lets start with the extremely obvious. I see a bomb hidden under the counter at a crowded bank, the counter reads 5 minutes, I exit silently, the bank explodes killing five. Ethical?

Of course not. But this is hardly a crowded bank and its not like lives are directly on the line. I produce that example simply to illustrate the point that in some situations it is indeed appropriate, perhaps even morally urgent to announce one's exit and reason for said exit, and in others its not.

The question then becomes which is the case here?

My exit of the stumble upon community with regard to providing content and thus profit for them, is based on what I consider to be a destructive attitude towards civil liberty and freedom of expression generally, like the employer who fires everyone who refuses a drug test. Sure its legal, but are there not larger freedom related implications? Think of it like a boycott.

I follow the logic of an employer being able to do as it please on its own private property, and while I disagree with an abstract noun being given the same rights as me, I do understand the position. But the matter becomes ethically complicated when you note that all employers can engage in this behaviors and most people must be employed. Suddenly Corporate law becomes defacto criminal law and if you do not conform you pay your fine for violation of said law in opportunity costs.

My point is that my exit was not merely a gambit for attention to myself, but attention to a series of social problems of which SU policy and the attitude of its most popular posters is merely a symptom.

Innomen as a stumbler identity has in a fundamental way, died. I'll admit that he could rise again, depending only on my mood, but if that's not the case, does he not deserve last words?

There is no deceit here. When I wrote that post I felt that way, and I still do. As I explain in the post I still use the inbox and the send/receive url function. I am automatically notified when I get a new review, as any experienced stumbler knows.

I like blogspot better for the purposes of self expression. It has a clean and easy to use interface, and that's because of course it is made for what I'm doing with it.

It's telling that there are apparently two camps, "those who have asked "Are you really leaving?" and followed it up with kind words", and then "everyone else" aka "you people" (horrible and/or ignorant).

Not at all, and you know better.

The "private" bit does also seem a tad ironic in light of his contacting people, often with huge assumptions, then posting their private responses all in relation to himself.

I respect the respectful. I post what I feel is ethical and relevant. This can take the form of me not caring about what someone thinks, and me caring deeply about what someone thinks.

If a person talks to me and I talk back I own my responses. I have permission to post everything I've ever posted of someone else, even though I don't see any ethical need to acquire said permission. If someone doesn't want me to post their words and my responses, I create a hypothetical version of the conversation with no identifying bits.

You seem reaching, if you read more of my work I'm sure you'll find something easier to tear down if you're looking to troll for whatever reason.

Self Defense: Pigasus

In which our hero Innomen laments the world's failure to grasp the genius of his self indulgent ramblings. He's leaving... well sort of... NO HE'S REALLY LEAVING... he's kind of leaving. Dude, stop saying goodbye and just go. Even money this guy is back posting in 30 days or less.

This kind of obvious misrepresentation coming from people who clearly haven't even read my work is a big part of why posting on SU has become as futile as looking for depth on myspace.

If I choose to return to SU I assure you, your opinion of said action will be even more irrelevant. I'd be glad if something changed my opinion of the community's quality as a whole. Enduring your "I told you so" would be worth a welcome trade.

I also adore how I'm given shit for being sad at people not understanding and thus adopting my position given that in my opinion the only thing I would gain if people did, would be the satisfaction of helping others.

Put that in perspective. I'm hated for being sad at the fact that people are rejecting a way to maximize both the quality and quantity of life.

That fact is why no hater will ever get under my skin.

At most they could conclusively prove me wrong about something at which point I would gladly adapt, since my goal here despite popular misconception is not to defend what I am, but to grow. And that means change.

Having said that, if I appear rigid and unthinking to you, please consider that while I do indeed want to change, maybe I just don't want to change into what you would like.

The one thing all my haters have in common is the in ability to seriously consider the possibility of me being correct.

They are so sure of that not being the case, it is so obvious to them, that they never make any real effort to prove it. Not a single point.

And after two solid years of writing at least three hours a day, its not for a lack of claims.

The reason for that is simply not even contemplated by my haters. I can say that without equivocation because those former haters who had done so, and engaged me in rational debate, typically taught me something while learning something and made a friend.

But I'm sure saying that I like making friends rather than something manly and violent about enemies makes me a loser or something.

*shrugs*

Self Defense: annex10

Pretty constructs do not make you a hero. Your ability to wax philosophic and twist logic into a ladder where only you can be on top makes everything you say of little value, impact, or importance.

Agreed completely.

Good thing I've never claimed the first or engaged in the second.

Self Defense: Company Girl 1

This is an exchange I had with yet another Company Girl on stumble upon. This post is special in that it is the shortest amount of time it took to go from total stranger to name calling to blocked.

I find that the people who I'm wrong about stand up and debate it and we usually end up being friends, but if I'm dead on, I get a whining pouting vitriolic reaction typified by the one below.

This one covers all the bases. She tried to attack virtually everything that a stranger can attack.

I find it adorable and quite telling.

(Name hidden to prevent whining.)

1:39pm How truly bizarre. I just read your 'review' and it doesn't actually make any sense. Its as though you've gone off on some weird rant that has everything to do with you and absolutely nothing to do with me or anything I've posted. Being nothing but gratuitously abusive isn't really expressing an opinion... is it ? I know abuse is your online 'act' but really .. this is intellectually bankrupt and isn't worthy even of you ... :))

________________________________________


Innomen

1:53pm Yes yes bury your head in the sand, pretend I didn't even make an argument, attack the messenger.

How original.

I suppose I shouldn't expect much more from a girl who lifted her avatar right out of cosmo.
________________________________________


(Name hidden to prevent whining.)

1:58pm I've heard from quite a few people that you have this 'problem' with girls online ... but really SU isnt supposed to be psycho-therapy. What you wrote .. referencing the 'sexuality' element of my days post .. made absolutely no sense at all. You were talking about something entirely different than what I wrote about. The review was about *you* .. not about me. I'll debate my liberal credentials with most people, but they have to at least make sense. Incidentally .. you included a couple of links in your review .. one to your own blog .. thats really not acceptable and its an abuse of the review system. You should remove them ..:)
________________________________________


Innomen

2:13pm *rolls eyes* So when ad hom didn't work now its the argument from authority. So fact is a matter of vote? Can we all get together and vote on cancer being unreal then?

"You were talking about something entirely different than what I wrote about."

No actually I wasn't that's the point, drone. Of course I don't expect you to understand or even be open to the fact that there is a possibility that you don't understand.

"Thats really not acceptable and its an abuse of the review system."

Yea I'm sure you find my work unacceptable considering that it basically show that your whole worldview is a sham.

I'm done wasting my time on you, if you wish to debate publicly I'm all for it. You're beyond help, far too drunk on attention to be of any intellectual value.

________________________________________

(Name hidden to prevent whining.)

2:21pm *laughing* .. your 'work' ? Well thats the best laugh I've had today...:)) Anyway ... thats not the point . The fact is that including external links to your own sites under the guise of reviewing is an abuse of the review system and I routinely block and remove the reviews of the spammers who do it. Its up to you but I don't provide a platform on my site for abusive rants or spamming for external sites. Anyway .. try to relax .. honestly being the playground bully is *not* going to make any girl online take ytou seriuously or take any notice of you .. believe me .. just some friendly advice ..:))

And finally, the reason I've posted it is because she blocked me, thus trying to deny me of my right to response. Whiny little girls are SO fond of this. The internet equivalent of a crank call.

So here it is. My response:

Am I supposed to be concerned that you think badly of my work? You have the intellectual value of a tick in my estimation. Just because you typed that you were laughing am I supposed to start crying now? I love how some people never leave grade school.

Including external links is my right, especially if the whole of the link's content is my material. It's called citation. I've established my opinion on the subject before and you're not worth the duplication of effort, hence the link. Calling me a spammer is slander (libel?), I don't make a dime from any of my online work. If you want to imply a breech of protocol you should look to yourself first.

And finally what makes you think I'm at all concerned what any "girl" thinks of me?

That type of assumption is exactly the kind of sexism I'm trying to kill.

News flash: Men can be motivated by things other than sex.

Thanks for the material sugar, its been a real gas :)

Self Defense: Rashgallivak

Rashgallivak

You didn't pass your English classes in school, did you?

False dichotomy. As Frank Zappa and Ray Bradbury, not to mention the millions that live and die, before or around, formal education as you know it, have shown through thought, speech, and action, education simply does not equal intelligence or ability.

If education equals anything its indoctrination. Wiki does not make me pledge allegiance to anything and the library does not care if I have a gun in my backpack, savvy?

All education means is picking a side and paying your membership dues.

Fuck education, I prefer learning, knowledge, and skill.

Besides, even if I did have a problem with English, which is laughable (and I did) I might add, why assume that its my fault? Do Italian people have to take Italian all the way through college?

Look at this shit.

So yes I passed English class, but even if I hadn't asking that question reveals your own ignorance far more effectively then a negative answer to your question would have revealed mine.

Have a sweet day.

Self Defense: Rufus777

See, this is part of my beef. This guy had a completely different review of me and then he changed it and it didn't alert me. they really don't want people responding to reviews no matter how libelous or false.

Anyway...

In this installment the guy takes exception to my claim of general amicability with my RL peers and ex girlfriends.

I wish to point out that the only time I even bring my RL standing up is in response to the common claim of me being a total social shut in, hated by the world, and hating it in turn, which is simply not the case. I personally don't see what I do in my down time or my standing with women has to do with anything, but apprently if I'm not being blown at this moment, nothing I say can be correct, if I take the trend to its most logical extreme.

I know that sounds like sarcasm, but think about it. no matter what you're doing, socially speaking it would be cooler and more acceptable if you were a male and you were ebign blown by a female. That's pretty sexist and sad really.

Anyway.. Sorry for the ramble.

My point is this: Granted, I'm an introvert. I love to read, and I enjoy spending time alone. But it is hardly because I am hated or feel hated. I am simply comfortable with myself and I happen to be of very low income, and in our consumerist society most activities come with a price tag. I don't even own a car, and I live in a town with less than 100K people. What am I going to do under thsoe consditions, really?

Rufus777

The more I read the more I dislike you dude, you say that you have had all these roommates and that you are still friends with them, as well as your ex girlfriends, except for one, then tell me why you have stirred up so many of the people here on stumble? Let me explain it, oh I don't know, maybe ... yep that's it! You are a lying bastard!! And you get your kicks by trying to belittle people on the internet, man that was easier then I thought! You can't fool everyone, most of us have seen right through you and your tall tales of being so well liked, even if you are well liked in the real world, you are not well liked here. I know you will spend some time trying to write something to discredit me and my opinions, go right ahead, but I just wanted you to know that I share many of my opinions with nice people here on stumble, and one of them is about what a Douchebag you are!! Don't let this rent too much space in your head, just tell yourself how great you are and it will all go away!! ;)

Here are my specific responses.

...you are still friends with them, as well as your ex girlfriends, except for one, then tell me why you have stirred up so many of the people here on stumble?

Quite simply because my friends have been selected over a term of years, while stumblers are a much larger random sample selected over a maximum of two years.

You are a lying bastard!! And you get your kicks by trying to belittle people on the internet.

Its hard not to stoop to sarcasm here. I'll just simply say that neither of us believe that, and you've succeeded in making yourself look not so good.

You can't fool everyone, most of us have seen right through you and your tall tales of being so well liked, even if you are well liked in the real world, you are not well liked here.

Big words coming from a profile with 5 fans to my 245. I realize there is a time issue, I've been here longer, and that does indeed matter, but If I were truly unlikable, I don't think any duration difference would totally explain that discrepancy.

Besides, I'm not here trying to get people to like me, I couldn't give a shit frankly. I just want them to live and be happy and not take me down with them when they get themselves into some planet wide hip deep shit.

Don't let this rent too much space in your head, just tell yourself how great you are and it will all go away!! ;)

Heh, don't worry. Since I really am great, I don't need you or anyone else to share that opinion. Which is why I don't call people names beyond definable labels as a result of specific behaviors. Like racist, sexist, or Luddite.

I know you will spend some time trying to write something to discredit me and my opinions...

You can't discredit an opinion because its an opinion. That would be like somehow being able to prove ranch is better than thousand island using lab equipment. No, my only goal with these responses is to point out the subjective, personally belittling, name calling, and ultimately childish nature of my best (worst?) negative reviews.

For example...

"...what a Douchebag you are!!"

I rest my case.

Nude Photography is not Art

Sorry for some nude stumbles i have been stumbling this week, actually i like it as an ART.

I recently fished this gem off a Stumbleupon page of a person with like 600 fans claiming to be a single woman from England. Naturally, her avatar photo looks like a 15 year old leaving for the mall.

Now I don't know this woman, never even spoke to her, or even read her blog other than her profile page, she may actually be what she claims to be, and may not be selling an image to promote various online enterprises, she may also be the most compassionate intelligent woman on the face of the earth. Though I must admit a measure of doubt.

But she's just the straw that broke the camel's back on a subject I've been meaning to speak about. I love a little hottie as much as the rest of you, in fact when I build my robot lover, I'll use photos lifted from 'nude art' blogs as a base for her construction I'm sure.

But I really need to make a point clear here about erotic photography claimed as art. The women may be attractive but you need to understand why. They are not beautiful like a sunset is beautiful. Consider, if it were nude 400 pound flabby hairy men?That's just as much a miracle of biology. Hell even more so. A healthy young woman doesn't inspire any question other than "How best could I sell my soul as her slave to acquire a millisecond of sexual service?" Flabby behemoths are far more interesting, you find yourself thinking "How does it even walk?"

Sex is not art.

I love hearing people try to say artsy things about nude photos. "Look how the light catches her smooth rounded breasts." That would so not work if the subject was a new york truck driver."Look how the light catches his lumpy asymmetrical frontbutt."

Sex is sex and there's nothing wrong with it. After all, I'm the guy that wants to deregulate prostitution, eliminate age limits in favor of a true maturity/inteligence based citizenship test, populate the world with thinking feeling, loving, AI driven or grown sex dolls, and annihilate all sex/relationship/marriage/love law beyond overt harm such as rape, privacy invasion, assault, etc. Flaunt it if ya got it I say, but don't try to make us fight over it. Because people get hurt that way. If you're gunna show off your cookies, be ready to share, or at least sell for a fair price.

Point is, I'm no prude. But confusing sex with art is dishonest. We live in a world that is grossly sexually oppressed. Sex has come to equal art because religion has made sex dirty, corporations have made sex costly, and government has made sex a crime, so we say that our porn is art to keep our girlfriends, wallets, and freedom.

It's REALLY pissing me off.

We say beautiful when we mean fuckable. We say fresh when we mean fuckable. We say adorable when we mean fuckable. And we say Art when we mean porn. Along with all the other advertising and lyrical euphemisms for sex and sexual service. There's virtually no compliment you can pay a girl these days that can't be easily translated or doubled into some sex reference. And calling porn art does not bloody well help. Now don't get me wrong, there are forms of erotic art, The Story of O, I bow before that books greatness for example, but paying a hottie to squirm on the hood of a 300k$ car is not it.

99.99999999999999999% of erotic photographers are closet Johns. (and Janes?)

Bullshit Photographer: “I'm not paying for a sexual favor, I'm making ART, yea thats it, ART. Now here Britney, grip this riding crop in your teeth, squish your tits together, arch your back, and crawl for me.”

Every popular musician has turned into a strip tease artist, singing what amount to one way phone sex into cd's and selling it. I didn't choose the name Britney by chance. Everyone loves a school girl in a short skirt asking “Hit me baby one more time.” Come on, a whole generation of people wanted to pretend they had a spanking fetish like me for 30 seconds when they first saw that video. Girls to, because they saw the effect it was havering on the guys. “You mean I can sport a plaid mini skirt, white panties, with little girl pigtails, and get whatever I want from half the population? Where do I sign up?”

Ticketmaster and Tower Records apparently. And now fucking Stumbleupon as well.

If I had the money I would hire a professional photographer to do nudes of myself styled after each and every one of these so called art pages, white are always full of black and white child like nude models or shaven muscle bound metrosexuals, and see how many people still call it art when it's my flat hairy behind pressed up against the windshield.

Art is something you create, something from your mind and hands. Good photography is an art because of what it takes to get that shot and set construction timing etc. Nude photography is not art. Any funded jack ass can pay a hottie to strip somewhere and squirm around on something while he takes 10,000 photos and pick out the one where she stopped looking like a pill head with ruined dreams of nursing long enough for the shutter to click.

I see living barbie girl #345,836,385 squirming in the sand in front of a beautiful sunset, and I think, I wish that greedy vapid bitch would go get a job that involves actual work and move so I can see that sunset better. And I wish that asshole with the money for a 12mp camera and a trip to Tahiti would take pictures of something without breasts that I can make my back ground without turning my computer into the equivalent of a sticky centerfold scotch taped to the wall in a 15 year old's closet.

Any of my regular readers notice my complete lack of compunction with regard to the personal and subjective tone of this piece? That right. Expect more of this because like is said before.

I'm fucking done.

Self Defense

This blog post was a collection of my replies to reviews made about me.

I can't stand when people send a message in the form of a review. It's like an open letter to a dead man, needless grand standing. Or like the guy that pretends to be talking to a given person but is actually talking to the audience. But this is even more lame because there's no way to respond, unless of course you make a blog somewhere heheh. But I'm still at somewhat of a disadvantage because someone has to click this to see it.

Since Stumbleupon in its infinite wisdom is apparently going to go the route of Myspace and never upgrade their service now that it is popular, case in point the inability to publicly reply to public reviews, I've taken it upon myself to create this solution. I will not block these reviews or any negative review so long they have content. Unlike my most recent batch of haters, I have respect for freedom of speech.

Edit: This page grew so long and confusing that I've now cut up each defense into separate posts.

I'm having so much fun :)

Links to the individual posts coming soon.

----

• Self Defense: imorgen
• Self Defense: Pigasus
• Self Defense: annex10
• Self Defense: playermatt
• Self Defense: Rashgallivak
• Self Defense: Rufus777
• Self Defense: CantaloupeSwing
• Self Defense: smittygator
• Self Defence: nomadtoads
• Self Defense: tedomatic
• Self Defense: ryquail
• Self Defense: justinlg
• Self Defense: lazygit
• Self Defense: Win-and-God
• Self Defense: somebody
• Self Defense: naeri
• Self Defense: OptimizeMe
• Self Defense: parallaxblue
• Self Defense: Helsinkip
• Self Defense: Agent-fisher
• Self Defense: Geckotape