The Challenge

Jesus Christ I wish I'd get a new response once in awhile. You know where they got the idea to ban cloning? From all the damn clones.

Time and again I get the same attacking argument-free responses, to virtually everything.

But the most verbose, homogeneous, and hateful are those from a particular group.

Women who are so accustomed to be worshiped for the perceived pleasurability of their various orifices, that they post advertisements of them in subtle and not so subtle ways.

Women who are quite obviously to me attempting to auction themselves off to the highest bidder or to secure the future of their thus acquired contracts.

Women for whom honesty is not an option because of the doublethink implicit in their vitriolic attack on what they perceive to be a lower class.

You see, I tell a woman she's trying to profit off of her breasts, and she thinks I'm calling her a whore.

Far from it. I respect whores. Whores are honest and direct and obey the will of the market. No, I see both whores and sluts as sacred almost, doubly so because of the society in which they grew. Whores are usually from poverty, which means the know the truth about society eve if they may not be able to articulate it or exploit it effectively.

And sluts are generous, or at least honest with themselves and unashamed to take what they want when they can get it regardless of social finger waggling. If nothing else, if a woman is a slut and that is her chief "problem" then she's caused more happiness than the average person. And in my view, all it takes to be a good person is causing more happiness than you destroy.

So no I'm not calling you a whore, you don't deserve such a compliment.

Let me run down the usual list of bullshit I get.

For my audacity I am called the follow, or the following claims are made about me. I'm going to answer each one, so that i can post this link as a response to the canned responses I regularly get. I wish I had thought of this approach before but a form letter just didn't seem needed. Looking back, it clearly was. I've spent hours of my life, maybe even days or weeks solid when added up, responding to the human intellectual equivalent of mayflies.

Homosexual: Besides being totally irrelevant, I'm straight. I can't offer proof of this, but then again nor do I feel the need to. I haven't been offended by attacks on my sexuality since 7th grade.

Male chauvinist: Actually I'm closer to a feminist. Men by and large are addled by constant testosterone overdose, and they are unquestionably the most violent gender, this in my view makes them weak. Although I do blame women for this generally in the modern world because of the constant preference for cavemen. It is a biological fact that speciation is a power that rests squarely in the hands of the females. Sexual selection is fueled by the chooser gender and by definition, that is the female of the species. No, if I were a male chauvinist I'd swallow the party line of innocent victim princess mommys that need to be protected and obeyed and sheltered and catered to for all time, and I would ask them to be responsible or accountable for their choices as a group, as men are clearly expected to be. I ask of them what is asked of me because I see them as AT LEAST equal.

Pitiful: Heh, I think you mean pitiable. Anyway, maybe. That's really not up to me. I have pain as much as the next human. to me pity is something reserved for a victim, so if you honestly pity me then it's not my fault anyway. I don't pity myself, I see my life thus far in many way as absurdly lucky, almost ideal in both what I have experienced and what I haven't.

Pathetic: Impossible to rationally counter, too subjective.

Ugly: Impossible to rationally counter, too subjective.

Fat: I'm 6'5" and I weigh 245. I ride my bike twice a day, weather permitting. you call.

Stupid: Not according to my most recent psych evaluation.

Narrow minded: Read my whole blog.

Hateful: Read my Whole blog.

Judgmental: Uhhh, yea, I'm a conscious human, I make judgments constantly. I balance them with being open minded. If people would actually try to argue these point maybe I'd have a different opinion, but calling me names isn't going to persuade me or anyone else. If that's even the point.

Rude: Yea, and so was bring up women's suffrage. Social convention matters to me about as much as a gram of navel lint.

Insane: That's a matter of numbers, and therefor depends on how you look at it. Sure I may be insane by today's standards but if I'm far enough ahead of my time, I'll be vindicated later.

Petty: In anything I'm a lofty minded narcissist. I see everyone else as being petty specially if they can't see past their own genitals.

Troll: I believe every word I say, I am not trying to get a rise out of anyone, I'd prefer universal agreement, but I wont pander to get it either. I don't care if I piss you off, one way or the other, at least not enough to do much about it.

Belittling: See Troll.

Insecure: I advocate polyamory, I post my real face and name online, I posted my psych evaluation. I think of myself as a modern Buddha. If anything I'm an ego maniac. I have one secret that I don't post because of its embarrassing nature, and that's all. I assure you it has nothing to do with these matters anyway.

Friendless: Ironically, As I write this I'm pressed for time due to a social function. I'll admit I don't have many friends, but since everyone is so fond of cliches, I'll repeat one, its not about quantity, its about quality. Besides my circle would be much larger if the Company hadn't set upon them like a pack of velociraptors.

Uneducated: In that I have no degree, sure. However you'll be hard pressed to find a subject of scientific importance that I cannot intelligently discuss. I may not be able to rattle off names and dates without Google's help, but I've got the concepts down. Besides, Bush graduated from Yale, nuff said.

Causeless: HA! Wow. Saving humanity from an Orwellian future isn't a worthwhile cause? I'm trying to show you the one tool which they most use to control you.

Which brings us to The Challenge for my detractors. My supports can do this easily.

If you can answer this question with any degree of insight, you'll have my respect.

The question is this: Why is it advantageous for any of the following, to suppress polyamory and/or support monogamy? Religion/Government/Commerce

You may choose one or all. The only rule is you must not use a self referencing defense. For example you may not say that religion supports monogamy because adultery is a sin, or that government supports monogamy because polygamy is illegal, or that commerce supports monogamy because it is profitable, you must tell me WHY these things are.

It must at least pretend logical rigor and objectivity.

Your move.

Screw Your Rules: Delivery

This post is in response to the general type of statement mocked below. It pisses me off mightily, for a variety of reasons not the least of which is that pandering to the idiot masses for power is what every worthless politician in history has done, and I'm not looking for votes, I'm looking for truth.

Once again, for the cheap seats, if it matters to you more how I say something than what I say then your opinion is worthless to me. You are not human to me, you are a consumer, a demographic, a mindless automaton that follows instructions delivered with the proper syntax. You've abandoned your ability to think critically, and with it your right to influence the future beyond the unavoidables of your physical existence.

I will not feed you what I consider be truth like a bitter pill to a mindless dog.

*Dress it up. Tone it down. Why be so "rude"? Honey than vinigar. People don't want to hear it. Spoon full of sugar. * blah blah blah

I'm going to say what I like, and if you don't like it you can choose to not read it.

You seem to assume its possible to convince people of anything. It is not. At best you plant the seeds in receptive soil, and much like in nature, either it will grow or it will not. Soil/environmental conditions are the prime concern, not how gently I dug the hole.

You seem to think as if this generation is the only one. You seem to think the environment will stay like this forever, and to adapt myself to it and the thinking style that gave birth to it is not a waste of time, when in fact it is.

My delivery and the bitterness of it is precisely the tone I want because my target audience is not the people happy with being lemmings, my target audience is the group that is sick to death and very angry. they are and will be the marginalized intelligent who have been passed over again and again by a culture with a teenager's grasp of profundity and a greed to rival Midas.

And no, those who demand polish and hat-in-hand delivery don't matter. They are meat byproducts. The meek shall inherit, is that it? Funny how those odious sentiments ooze from the lips of the not-so-meek.

My position will have value and find adherents or it will not, and my delivery matters little. Freud was an insufferable asshole, as was Mandelbrot, and Nietzsche and countless others with high self opinion and a deep desire to explore and share their work.

Either I am one of them, or I am a crack pot. I leave that up to your children to decide. Either way they won't care how polite I was.

When thinking of my tone, in the face of my positions correctness or lack of, ask yourself, in 100 years who's gunna care?

I will not pander to you or anyone else's idea of what is "proper". Because when you get right down to it, my position itself is technically "rude" since its basically terrorism according to our current society. Proper is subjective.

Newsflash, I advocate the eradication of the basic need for government using the non violent forces of economics and memetic engineering. I'm a variety of anarchist, I've developed my own religion, and I despise corporations of all stripe, and I think monogamy is a scam. Do you really think that how I explain my position and reasoning matters?

I plan to live for the next 2000 years at the minimum, the people that scoff at my words because of my tone will die out long before me and frankly if we cared what the dead thought, we'd still be worshiping the sun and chasing bison.

This is not the 19th century, and honesty trumps etiquette in the minds of all who matter. Because as comfortable as euphemism and self deception is, I don't want lying morons on my side, savvy?

However, while my goal is merely the discovering truth in order to aid happiness and life, the propagation of it is not against my goals. If those who make these claims of improper delivery see past it, and recognize something of value, you have my leave to translate my work. Just try not to lose the spirit of it.

Gladatorial Meat

Multiplex #48: Happy Birthday, Becky

Now I'm not a moron, I get it, and I do have a sense of humor, I did laugh. But... to me this is a bit like a racist joke, not that ti IS a racist joke, just that it illustrates something that is actually a deep social problem.

Here's what I'm on about... Notice in the first panel how the idea to torture the guy was totally mutual? It looks to me like they both had the same idea at the same time and executed it with equal skill.

Why then does the guy get attacked and the "girl" (despite being 18, and therefor a woman) merely have to announce the presence of a vagina to avoid an assault that most would agree was earned? (If one subscribes to the idea that one CAN earn assault, as most of you do judging from the latest poles on bar behavior and child rearing.)

Quite simply because, like so much gladiatorial meat, men, have almost no value beyond their production capacity. Thus, it's ok for us to fight, even if a slip could result in death for one and life in (or associated with) jail for the other. Further, since the people depicted are low income its not like anything they do matters anyway, except the girl, her job is just to stand around and be hot and pick through suitors, again, like so much meat.

Unlike the worthless (judging from their jobs and income of course, the only things about men that matter besides thier familial status)men, she's not a loser, she's merely unmarried. Which ironically makes her more valuable socially, as she represent a potential sex slave, domestic worker, and status symbol to all who are in the market for such things.

So yea, while I did get a chuckle, I am not amused.

Spanking: More mindlessness.

One can really tell critical thinking is prized highly among the pro assault crowd. /sarcasm

Just recently I saw the following gem.

I think that most people feel that spanking is bad. in some cases, a spanking can help. I very rarely had to spank my kids,,but when I did, they knew that it was because they were doing something that they had been told time and time again not to do.

Beating and spanking are two different things.

Spanking with the goal of producing healthy happy socially adjusted adults is about as adept as the rubber mallet approach to TV repair.

"Duhhhrrrrrr it not doing what me want HIT HIT! I not hit hard... see now it work YAY! Me good parent!"

It's quite simple, on a number of levels. (albeit apparently not simple enough for the shockingly limited average intellect of the pro spanking parent.)

Would you tolerate a spanking from your employer? If he or she were to give you one, what would the charge be? Assault? Sexual battery? Can you talk your way out of assault saying "Well I didn't hit X very hard."

News flash: Children are human citizens and deserve equal protection under the law. Can you legally hit a citizen just because they annoy you?

Past all that, who says what you are asking is reasonable? I knew plenty of people well beyond their parents in both wisdom and intelligence. Knocking some girl up or getting knocked up does not instantly make you fit to parent responsibly or issue order backed by physical force.

That's why we train police and soldiers, and even they have a very hard time of it.

If you're too inept to trick or convince a child into willfully undertaking the desired set of actions, and the only recourse you can think of is punishment, (of any kind, in my opinion) then you're too stupid and callous to be a parent in the first place.

http://nospank.net/arnall.htm

The only reason this is still a debate at all is because The Company wants absentee teen morons raising children so they can provide TV, School, military, and religion, as alternates. Thereby halting social evolution, which is the largest threat to established institutions ever devised.

The average American parent actually raises their own children about as much as the sap paying a 20$ a month guilt check to some kid in Somalia.

Debate.com: Final debate.

From the Webmaster here...

Hi Brandon,

Please keep in mind that the "identity confirmation" is only used to prevent users from creating multiple accounts and thus cheating the other members of the site and the site itself. A user can still debate without confirming their identity, they just cannot vote. Debate.com does not use your cell phone number to send spam, we don't sell it, we don't send you anything but a confirmation code. If e-mail verification worked perfectly we would have stuck with that, but you likely saw what it did on Version 2.0. Users were creating upwards of 10-20 accounts in some cases.

My response...

I'm supposed to trust you? Why? You obviously don't trust me. How about you give me your cell number. I promise I won't sell it. It's against my policy. Is that reassuring? Of course not. Everyone has their price. Once your database gets large enough someone will make an offer on it, or better yet perhaps someone will steal it. There are countless reasons not to do what you do, and only a handful to do it.

If you knew they were creating false accounts then why not delete them? Whatever mechanism you used to spot them could be used to prevent them from registering.

Forums have been dealing with false identities for years. And you'd be able to avail yourself of their creativity if you'd take your page non-profit open source.

Some of the countless available solutions are as follows. Rating systems. Only users with so many posts are allowed to vote. Or here's another, maybe a user has to be rated by so many other users before they can vote, or maybe only one ID per IP. Or an artful combination. Or two voting sections, one for anonymous, one for "verified", and let the viewer decide which is more "accurate." Or something completely different.

The positions expressed in my debate stand. You say I can debate but I can't vote, how aburd(snicker).

Why bother talking when I don't have a say?

P.S. As at least one other has noted. It's no surprise that I'm "losing" my debate. Those who agree with me would not have registered in the first place, and those who can vote clearly think the invasion is tolerable. It's a miracle I got a vote at all. Each one of my votes represent a disgruntled user. Someone who didn't appreciate being asked to empty their pockets into a tray.

Self Defence: MiaDreamR

Wow, still having to write these things. I must say I'm flattered. If what is said about me in this post and others is true in the extent that I somehow have a pathological craving for attention, which I am neither conforming nor disputing given that it is not my place to offer objective valuations of my own subjective character, then I must say I've certainly gotten it.

I think I get hate reviews more frequently now then I did when I was still posting.

But hey responding to them is a blast, so here goes.

This one came from yet another Company girl who thinks individuality and her value as a sentient comes from the degree to which men wish to copulate with her, IE how “pretty” she is. I've said most of this before and by now I really don't care if you're saved from your genes or die a slave to them, so I'm going to assume you understand the bulk of what I'm saying because you've read the rest of my work and understood it as well, or you don't because you can't and you're irredeemable.

I just read your review of my page. Thanks for your opinion. Albeit, a bad one- You're entitled to it. Since you're so hot on the subject (Or maybe you just get off on hearing yourself speak) That wasn't a glamour shot- I'm pretty. And I have the right to be pretty and post my picture if I so choose- I'm not half naked, I'm not posed in a sexual manner- in fact, it's barely a head shot. Just a picture of my face. If you think that is a glamour shot, well thank you- But that "glamour shot" is not license for me to be harassed by horny creepy men and since most of those men don't respond to kind subtle requests, I needed something more blunt and assertive. And it definitely works. Even when self righteous, pompous mouth pieces think otherwise. From the looks of it, you're the one begging on bended knee for attention. And I have no problem with that- whatever gets your through the day- just keep it away from me.

That's the full text of a review pasted here in full so that when/if she changes it my responses won't look absurd, which happens all the time on stumbleupon, one of the myriad reasons I stopped creating content for them.

I'm going to respond in section, they will just be copy pasted from the main review above, you're not seeing double.

That wasn't a glamour shot- I'm pretty.

"Pretty" has come to mean sexually appealing. Do you mean pretty like a waterfall? Pretty like a snowflake? Or pretty like a fashion model. Beyond that, who's this "I'm" you're speaking of? I don't even see you in the picture. I see the ratio of distances between your eyes, nose, chin etc, I see the choices of makeup purchase and application, (which I'll get to in a minute), I see styled hair who's structure you neither designed nor naturally acquired

And I have the right to be pretty and post my picture if I so choose-

And I have the right to move to Iran and take up honor killing as a hobby. Does government tolerance for a thing make it morally correct? your rights end where other's begin and you're contributing to a system that destroys so many lives that its crippled the whole world. Before you met me your ignorance of this behavior was you only ethical fallback, but now that you've been exposed to my position and refuse to even explore it or debate it, you've surrendered that protection. Now you're complicit. In keeping with Godwin's law, I'll mention Nazis. You've gone from ignorant German citizen to Luftwaffe, once you understand and help anyway, you'll be SS. The fact that you think this behavior is your birthright is telling. I'll grant that it is in a way, in the same way it's a cancer cell's birthright to slaughter a pancreas, But that doesn't make it all ok.

I'm not half naked, I'm not posed in a sexual manner- in fact, it's barely a head shot.

Of course you're not half naked, you'll make whoever wants to see that pay nosebleed prices in opportunity costs through verbal contract, and cold hard cash through gifts. The irony is you're doing this on behalf of someone else and you're too dim to realize it even when its presented to you, but hey you're "pretty" so its not like having a brain really matters for you now does it. Not saying you don't have one, but like the fuzzy headed guy said, “you've been given a large brain by mistake".

Just a picture of my face.

Your face? What makes you think its yours? Again the genetics? Ok sure in that way its somewhat unique to you, but out of 6 billion people we have to be talking about an extreme degree of qualifiers. I mean when you pick up a snowflake do you really think of each of them as priceless and unique or do you see snow?

Your eyes naturally that dark? Or did you apply coloring to make them look larger. Your lips naturally that color and do you always drool enough to keep them slippery and wet or again is that an application of some sort? How about blush? Foundation? Hair products from shampoo to conditioner to spray and gel? How about the teeth?

If its your face and yours alone how come it looks like what I see staring at me from every television commercial and fashion magazine? How come its that exact face I see telling me to buy everything from Friday's over priced burgers to life insurance? How come its that face I see on every movie and television love interest extolling one social virtue or another and demanding that I as a man I jump through some absurd hoop to win the right to please you sexually, since if I get that far and only enjoy myself I've still failed?

You're a product honey, and you've rolled off an assembly line as sure as a Toyota. That's not your face. You bought it from a thousand companies and you hung it on your flesh like a sneetche's star.

You seem to claim that this choice is completely non sexual, and that my implication that you're basically whoring yourself (which I have no problem with, BTW, prostitutes and sluts are a greater threat to the Company than I ever could be, in my mind your kind is beneath a whore since a whore to me is a valid and honest profession) is completely unfounded. Here's why.

Again let us examine something you may have been previously ignorant of.

Do you know why each of these things about your face is considered "pretty"? Lets start from the top and work our way down.

Hair. Your hair is treated to look a certain way because it indicates that it will be pleasing to the touch, as benign as that sounds, in the context of the rest of it it little more than a "love handle".

Forehead: No acne there, no shine of sweat, because since “girls” have to be plastic they can't be sweaty, sweaty isn't sexy unless its on a beach or somehow indicative of strenuous sex, or something contributing to sex, like say dancing/stripping, or working out. Along with the rest of the skin exposed in the photo other than your lips and eyes, its been masked completely with foundation to hide the fact that it's not smooth and perfect like a child's. And we have the first taste of why the teen pregnancy rate in America is staggering and why we have a permanent pedophile witch hunt in this country.

Eyebrows. Plucked and trimmed and sculpted, God forbid we're reminded that you, being a human adult have hair. Sexy little girls don't have hair unless its soft and silky smooth, or decoratively petite, demure demure even, pretty, small, controlled. And they have to be dark, lest they escape notice, and everything about a girl has to be noticeable if she's going to be "pretty".

Eyes. You know why you apply darkness to your eyes? Because it makes the eyes themselves which are reflective appear larger in relation to the rest of your head. You know what else has abnormally large eyes? A baby, or a child, or a kitten.

Cheeks. Blushed ever so subtly, to indicate maybe a hint of embarrassment, because you're perhaps thinking about sex, like a blushing bride, and being that you're a good (read submissive) virtuous (read sexually inexperienced, naive, trainable) girl. Always "girl", never "woman", you're only ever a woman when someone is telling you how strong and independent and uncontrollable you are, usually so they can control you.

Nose. Also anti-shine treated, to minimize its visual impact, because once again, since the nose and the ears grow throughout life, a small nose can mean a young person. You're supposed to have a little button nose just like a doll, a pliable unfeeling doll, that won't object too much. A doll that can be purchased and loved in private.

Lips. Ahh the lips, the most blatant part of the product lie that is "your" face. Glistening with gloss, slightly apart. Need I really describe the connotation of slick, pink, wet, slightly open, lips?

Are we seeing a pattern here? Now being that I'm basically discussing profitable pedophilia, I'm sure you'll start calling me a pedophile and thats fine, its nothing haven't heard before. But realize that I neither made up the following picture, or created the market forces, that are ultimately human forces, that made it possible.

Here's what I see, when I look at your picture and the billions like it. From a time when society was slightly more honest with itself about what it was and what it wanted.



But hey I'm just crazy right? And don't forget of low rank. Yea yea, I'm a sex crazed pedophile who lives in his mother's basement shunning all human contact, obviously a failure for having no beer in the house, spending his day divided up equally among hentai, hate speech, and video games, totally ignorant of the real world, stupid and pathetic in every way, a fat pimply virgin geek loser who is just jealous that he can't fuck someone like you and is lashing out. Right? I mean thats just about your position isn't it?

You wish honey, you wish. Enjoy your slave's existence. I suppose I wouldn't mind being a loved pet, a treasured possession of a superior being, or hell, maybe closer to a tick, or a intestinal worm. But I'm just too fond of my dignity to proceed.

Just know this. I look around and I know I earned everything I have, not in some Horatio Alger work way, but in that I understand it, and deserve it. I sleep like a baby knowing for a fact the world is a better place for me being in it. And so long as I am in it and do what I do it keeps being ever so slightly better. I earn my oxygen in happiness. I don't walk down the street and cause suffering and jealousy and self loathing, and then have the Gaul to claim that not only is there nothing wrong with profiting from this wake of horror, it's my right and I should be proud of it.

You, and all your kind, are doomed. You have two choices. Adapt or evolutionary oblivion. Human, or Eloi, you decide. Lucky for your kind those of my intelligence are typically gifted with compassion as well. We'll continue to take care f you long after your sexual value has become a distant memory in the face of other more stimulating pursuits.

Ignorance is no longer an excuse.

P.S. Reply if you wish, or not. Sorry for putting you on ignore on SU, I hate doing that, since I think it hides your review of me, but I'm done wasting time on crating content that only one person sees.

Self Defense: playermatt

Sometimes I feel like I could agree with Innomen, and then he goes batshit crazy the next sentence. It's like, "That makes sense... yes, good point... Ha, I can't believe I'm agreeing with Innomen! Wait. Wait. What the fuck? What the FUCK?" And, sadly, that's only about halfway through the wall of text.

Let me write a (comparatively!) concise version of every essay every written by Innomen, so that you never have to suffer through dedicating two hours of your life to his writings:

I am Innomen, the most original thinker in today's world. My alter-ego is a talking vagina, but forget about that -- I have no issues with women, and I'm definitely not a misogynist. In fact, I envy women! I wish I were a woman. If I were a women, I could have so much power over men, because, as everyone knows, women choose the man; the man never chooses the woman. Never! And I could always be the center of attention, everywhere I go! If only I were a woman... it's so hard being a heterosexual, white male in this matriarchal society. If only I were a woman, I could choose when and with whom to have sex, and I'd never be turned down, because, as we all know, no man has ever turned down a woman for sex. Ever. And I could sleep around all I wanted, with no repercussions at all, because women who sleep around are never vilified in our matriarchal society. If only I were a girl... (sigh) Girls don't know what it's like to be a man, and how hard it constantly is. In fact, did I ever mention that I got beat up in high school? I must be the only person in all of the world who attracted bullies, and, even though it's been over ten years, I still carry those wounds. Let me tell you about each and every bully who ever hurt me, because, let's face it, I'm the important one here. You're here just to be educated or be deprogrammed of your slave-think. I'm here to help you evolve into OH GOD I JUST CAN'T GO ON. I'M STARTING TO GET INSIDE INNOMEN'S HEAD, AND IT'S SCARING ME. AND YET, I CAN'T STOP BECAUSE IT'S CLEARLY UNDER 5000 WORDS. THE AGONY, THE SELF-HATRED, THE FEAR... HELP ME.

This guy is without a doubt my favorite hater for one simple reason. He's me when I was 15. Almost exactly. Its like the time machine paradox for me. I was guilty of every flaw here exposed. And so, what will likely be my final self defense post from stumble upon, given that I'm done producing content for them, barring more blasts from the past, I'm pleased to present my counter argument to this hateful and incorrect review.

Edit: That day I received 3 new reviews of hate, so his was obviously not the last.

First of all, I've been writing my whole life. And a good huge chunk of that body of work is to be found online. He says he dedicated two hours of his life to my “writings” and then complains about the “wall of text”. I'm thinking he had already decided how he felt before he even began reading, if he began reading at all.

I don't blame him really, its a daunting and unpleasant read, because of the daunting and unpleasant subject. But since I'm writing about the foundation of human society, those two traits, if found in relation to this subject at all, should warrant further reading.

Of course, if you're going to make up my position for me, as this young man has down so bluntly, I suppose reading the work isn't needed.

I'm tired of using the word and indeed the concept of strawman, but the repetition is hardly under my control. So long as people chose to argue with their own word rather than mine, I'll continue to point out this fact.

However, if taken as a list of implied arguments, instead as a sarcastic rant, why actually find a critically valuable list of counterpoint to my positions.
So what I'm going to do here is extract those implication to the best of my ability and answer those instead.

Deep down I think if I had met myself when I was 15, I'd have hated the older version, but I would have been fascinated none the less. In order to placate that satisfaction and allow my younger self to save face, I'll respond.

I apologize if I miss the mark with my extracted implications, but thats the price you pay for communicating via sarcasm. Next time figure out what you really mean and say that instead.

So lets get started.

“ My alter-ego is a talking vagina, but forget about that”

The implication being that I'm so obsessed and gender confused that I subcionsioly make my face genitalia.

Well, I will admit that gender roles do occupy a significant portion of my thoughts, but only on a systemic level beyond my personal animal needs. I'm quite comfortable with my body, ,gender and sexuality. I could go on.

“I have no issues with women, and I'm definitely not a misogynist.”

since the entire post is sarcastic, treating phrases as opposites will be common. This is the first such case.

If you seriously believe I hate women then you could not have progressed very far into my “writings”

read the article with woman hating in the title on my blogspot for a complete refutation of the claim that I hate women.

You then go on to imply again that I'm gender confused and wish to be a woman. And that I feel our society is a matriarchy.

Well, again, no, I'm quite comfy having boy parts, and no I don't consider our society a matriarchy My position is that if it were an open matriarchy things would be quite a bit improved. You like many have this lovely mental infection which causes you to make logical leaps it completely wrong directions. In this case the leap from the claim that mating is the most important aspect of social development and that women are the most powerful figure in mate selection and thus mating, to saying that society is ruled by women.

Society is an abstraction given birth to by the mating process, which is controlled by women this does not mean however that society itself is run by women. Far from it, like an abused mother with a gargantuan and aggressive teen, society is run by abusive ignorant greedy men with the fore site of a mayfly, and the morals of a pit viper.

Sure the mother shares a degree of responsibility, if such a thing even exists in the face of various facts about reality, but thats not top say that all social ills can be laid at the feet of women, especially considering that the choices women make in a cold feed back cycle are often controlled by that very society.

“I could choose when and with whom to have sex, and I'd never be turned down, because, as we all know, no man has ever turned down a woman for sex.”

so you think I'm oblivious to the fact that in certain circumstances the male becomes the chooser on a superficial level. Of course males get to choose at times, but only between women who have chosen them. Or women who choose them after being made aware of the fact that they exist as a choice.

This is not the same as claiming that women have never been turned down for sex, far from it, but of course you know all that, you're trolling. You're implying something here that even you don't believe in an effort to annoy me.

Fail. You might have noticed I like written debate, this whole thing is fun for me, I'm on my lunch hour, you're part of my hobby. :)

“And I could sleep around all I wanted, with no repercussions at all, because women who sleep around are never vilified in our matriarchal society.”

no, my position is that women have the authority on a personal level to begin to corrode monogamy, if you had read my work you'd know that I consider myself a champion of equal rights, not just men's rights. The slut player double standard is one of the many things I'd like to see annihilated. I'm well aware of the consequences a woman faces if she frees herself sexually, and wishing to remove those consequences would seem to also serve as an argument against the claim that I'm a women hating gender confused bigot :)

“In fact, did I ever mention that I got beat up in high school? I must be the only person in all of the world who attracted bullies”

First of all there is the implication that I'm supposed to not discuss what happened to me. Second of all is the implication that I can only take issue with a social problem if its a part of my day to day life. Third is the implication that I'm obsessed with my past experience simply because I make mention of it in perfectly relevant contexts, fourth is the implication that for a problem to have merit it must be unique.

Well, one, I'm not ashamed of my life or any of my reactions, my parents taught me from a very early age to not make decisions I would later regret and to grasp the concept that while a decision may have appeared correct t the time it may still be wrong, and that the perfect decision is an illusion. So I'm pretty well without regret.

Two, I use my experiences at the mercy of alpha idiots merely to highlight the duration of the problem and the duration of my thinking about the problem. There is an assumption that in order to know anything you must be 50 and have a degree in it that constantly needs attack. Most of my mention of my past is with an eye towards that sort of explanatory purpose.

Third, I'm well over my experiences on a personal psychological level beyond their impact on the formation of who I am today. In truth I handled what they did pretty well, I never even had nightmares, but I did think a lot about why I was treated as I was, it was a puzzle, and I've always liked puzzles.

And finally, my past is relevant in that I know it continues to happen all over the west. Perhaps everywhere. Anywhere children group, the adults in authority will encourage the males to fight amongst themselves with varying degrees of openness, and encourage the females to choose the strongest among them to desire and, choose the equal among them to actually pair with.

Did it occur to you that I simply care about the experiences of children? If not is that deficiency of imagination honestly my fault?

As a side note, if you can name two of my bullies I'll give you 10$ via PayPal.

“I'm the important one here. You're here just to be educated or be deprogrammed of your slave-think.”

this one is particularly amusing, am I supposed to take a sycophantic tone towards a faceless anonymous reader simply because statistically speaking at least one of them is going to be my superior intellectually or in any other way?

It's my writing on my blog, all about my opinion, and you're attacking my self important perspective? Thats like accusing a marathon running of being in too much of a hurry and overly competitive Have some awareness of the setting man. Do you think I just walk around and lecture people? Opening conversations with “did you know you're a moron?” everything has a time and a place, and this is exactly the time and place for my writing.

I will not speak in eprime simply because you've given up on context and perspective. Besides, the instant I did you'd simply accuse me of being simple minded.

I assume that readers are interested in my opinion when they read my blog. Color me crazy :P

“ I'm here to help you evolve into OH GOD I JUST CAN'T GO ON. I'M STARTING TO GET INSIDE INNOMEN'S HEAD, AND IT'S SCARING ME”

Thats quite interesting because where you stopped is pretty much where the singularity occurs heheh.

I'd stop too, lol.

You actually are in my head to a degree, you just have some slight imperfections in vision. I think you find me threatening because of our similarity. In some ways my mere existence threatens your identity. And I feel your pain. Often time I'll hate in others what I see in myself. But I'm doing better.

Thanks for the banter man, that was a great lunch hour :)