Gathering Dust

This blog is no longer maintained. See underlore.com.


Use bitcoin at Bitcoin Plus

Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina

FOXNews Claims Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina - Scanner

FOXNews Claims Jesus Will Guard Your Daughter's Vagina
Posted by Emily Farris

Rosenbaum's study showed that making a virginity pledge doesn't play a role any sexual behavior because teenagers who take a pledge are just as likely to have premarital sex as those who do not promise abstinence. The study also revealed that those who took virginity pledges where less likely to use condoms that non-pledgers, she said.

The church has been selling underage sex for hundreds of years. Does everything think they just stopped out of the goodness of their hearts? Please. You don't fuck with a recipe for power that good.

Church says: "We can't have the cloister girls playing safe! Then where would the teen pregnancy rate, and thus our supply of emotionally crippled children on which we build our future profits, be? No, WWJD bracelts are fine, so long as they bend over for the highest bidder, that way we can can 10% and the votes from both. My tax exemption isn't going to pay for itself you know. And besides I really like breaking in a promise girl right after a sermon about the evils of lust."

You know, it's quickly becoming pointless in my opinion to even share this shit with you people. How much more obvious does it need to be that you are being royally played?

Fucking mammalian roaches, the lot of you.

youtube: Beer Commercial Sexism

Heineken - Walk in Fridge Youtube

Innomen:

Gee, that doesn't reinforce any stereotypes. We should just start issuing uniforms to all your mindless consumer soldiers.

ludachrisj:

Wow, what is it like to have no sense of humour...?

Innomen:

I just don't think reducing men to beer swilling frat boys and women you ditsy shop-a-holics is funny. *shrugs*

"Gurls like shoes boys like beer." HUH HUH

And then there's the classism. The poor NEVER show up in beer commercials.

But I guess I'm expecting too much of a generation raised by the TV, who still daily suckle at it's glowing teat, who's picture of gender idealism is sculpted by pom poms and helmets.

Google and Sexism

This is a comment exchange from this page.

# Brandon M. Sergent says:
December 23rd, 2008 at 8:45 am

*sigh* I think its sexist to call something sexism that is an actual trend.

Now that everyone is done having a purse swinging tizzy of a fluke in page rank technology, how about you show me statistics on what PERCENTAGE of inventors are women?

In a world with 6.5 billion people, a counter example isn’t all that hard to find in social instances, for example name 5 organs no human has ever been born without.

Thus to understand something one doesn’t needs rules so much as trends.

Fact: Women invent less than men.
Fact: Of the top ten inventions that have improved human life the most, I’ll bet at least 8 were men.

For the record I credit women with the invention of medicine/science/philosophy as a matter of primitive likelihood. Gathering is more conducive to contemplative thought than hunting in my opinion. But that’s like saying protozoa invented humans, in that it’s a bit of a butterfly effect.
# Gravatar ANYC says:
January 4th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

Brandon - not much of a critical thinker, are you? Just because women have not had the opportunity to/nor have been given credit for something, does not indicate that they are incapable of it! Good grief, are you really so naive?
# Gravatar Brandon M. Sergent says:
January 5th, 2009 at 11:15 am

Google is a statistical machine. Google is not sexist. The demand to have it’s results altered to fit our idea of what is politically correct however, is. The fact is, the phrase “she invented” occurs so infrequently on the pages Google crawls that is was interpreted as a typo.

My guess is the VAST majority of global patent holders are unsexed (corporate) or male. Even discounting Corporate patents the trend I would say, holds.

USPTO.gov does not allow one to search by gender. But it does allow one to search by name. Toss in a few male names and then a few female names, you’ll see the tip of the ice berg.

“Yanisky-Ravid found that Israeli women accounted for just 1.9 percent of the inventors who registered their intellectual property in 2000-2005.”

Now that may be a policy problem in their country but it’s not specifically gender biased. The fact remains most of those credited with invention officially are men.

If you have a problem with facts being reported accurately, I’d say you fund an initiative to endow female inventors, or go be a creationist.

Men have abstract minds. Men dominate technology fields. Women can profit through men much easier and much more acceptably than the other way around. When a man rides a woman’s coat tail he’s a loser or a dead beat, when a woman does it she’s a home maker. Now I agree, that sucks, but tailoring Google results to hide this fact is a disservice to women, and rather Chinese in thinking.

For hundreds of years if nothing else women were footnotes in industry, that’s just how it was. Even if 50% of all current and future inventions were made by women, the stack would still be heavily in the male camp.
# Gravatar Brandon M. Sergent says:
January 5th, 2009 at 11:18 am

P.S. I’m a patented inventor.

Stepfather Sodomizes Son Who Sodomized His Daughter

Stepfather Sodomizes Son Who Sodomized His Daughter

In the ultimate case of retaliation, a father in Arlington is charged with aggravated sexual assault after sodomizing his stepson in revenge for the son sodomizing his 8-year-old stepsister.

To all the would be Torquemadas out there, quick to torture and call it righteousness.

Fuck the lot of you. Just goes to show you that the vast bulk of you are no better than apple tossing toothless degenerates that crowded around gallows, guillotines, and stakes.

What part of innocent until proven guilty is unclear? What aspect of protection from cruel and unusual punishment escapes you? You assholes are lucky the system you apparently have no respect for exists, or people like me would execute people like you with shocking speed and efficiency.

1. The justice system is not supposed to be about vengeance.
2. You puritanical ignorant slave brains are what cause this shit in the first place by treating pedophilia and other related exploitative sexual deviations as anything but a mental illness.
3. Whats the difference between wanton indulgence of lust, and wanton indulgence of vengeance? You're all literally just as bad as he is in thought.
4. No amount of rage justifies murder.
5. None of you have seen true violence, if you had you'd not be so quick to scream for blood.

You forget, if you ever knew, how quickly and easily if can be to become the victim. Ignorant pampered thugs.

You're all lucky I don't think like you. But even at my worst, I'm no torturer. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Everybody wants to be the hero, everybody wants to hurt the bad guy, well tell me you lot of cretins, how is raping him helping the child?

How is it not just a vicarious ego boost? Is torturing him suddenly going to undo her scars and pain? Is it going to deter future pedophiles? No. They all know broom stick rape and broken glass breakfast and human toilet duty await them in prison... If They Are Caught.

But no one ever expects to be caught, and the mentally ill can't help themselves even if they do.

You're all too stupid for oxygen, seriously.

How about every one of you loud mouth pricks send the girl 100$ for therapy and college? Put your money where your mouth is. Oh suddenly the line thins out and the crowd goes silent. Imagine that. Yeah. See evil is cheap. Good takes work.

You're all just jerking off in public.

Self Defense: ixbalam

Yet another "fan".

Ixbalam

"Women as a matter of course hurt themselves to up the market value of their sex."

You've left, but goddamn, I couldn't let the misogyny slide.

What about breast augmentation and bikini waxes, dick?

"You're an idiot, "dick"."

edit: apparently I am a "dick" for not drawing this conclusion from the existence of breast augmentation. And Innomen had to message me rather than insult me where everyone else can see him being an anti-feminist misogynist jerk. Good thing I don't stand for abuse.

Wrong again. I love publicity. I have 7 blogs on blogspot alone, do the math. :)

And yes I'm anti-feminist since the definition of masculist includes implicit sexism therefor so must feminism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism

O'course, that primary definition is all me.

You know even drunk as piss I'm better in matters of logic, ethics, and debate.

Grats and thanks.


Edit: I love it when people un-ignore me, post a message and then re-ignore me. It's almost as if they fear a response. heheh.

You called me a name, so it's only fair. Come on, do you really think waxes and boob jobs can only be explained as women trying to sell sex? Actually, I don't think I want to know the answer.

I called you a name? I'll bet it's a descriptor more than a name. Like calling someone how murders, a murderer. As to thinking about waxes, and boob jobs, yes. What other purpose could there possibly be? And even if that purpose was valid the majority are to enhance sexual allure. I wouldn't want to know the answer either, since it shatters your point. Hate me if you like, it's not like I invented this problem.

Don't kill the messenger.

Happy new year!

To Atheists:

Places like this exist because of the threat we pose to them, despite being wrong via incompleteness, and their inability to articulate their comprehension of that threat in the language we understand.

This is true of both sides.

Only our greatest minds can see the gap, and bridge it.

Atheists are as resistant to the idea of their vision being incomplete as theists are to the idea of their vision being incorrect.

We both must finally see past our own limitations.

You know how theists exacerbate the issue, but the rest of you seem blind to the flip side.

Atheists make it worse by acting so certain of the conclusions derived from observation and experimentation. Why such confidence? With only one universe, who's to say the physical rules wont change in the next 20 seconds nullifying the whole of science's data set? You have faith that this will not occur. Past stability is not evidence, correlation does not denote causation.

What happens when there is a question that cannot be answered?

Sure science gives us great control over the physical world, but the great questions remain. Whence comes logic? Why can't we have a square circle?

Science can only explain the physical rules by which existence operates, it cannot explain why those rules are as they are or most importantly why they are, at all.

Not why as in purpose, that's too personal, not why as in origin, that's too linear.

But. Raw. Simple. Why?

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

"Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe?" - Stephen Hawking

"Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" - Abraham Lincoln